CVE-2017-3882
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Universal Plug-and-Play (UPnP) implementation in the Cisco CVR100W Wireless-N VPN Router could allow an unauthenticated, Layer 2-adjacent attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The remote code execution could occur with root privileges. The vulnerability is due to incomplete range checks of the UPnP input data, which could result in a buffer overflow. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious request to the UPnP listening port of the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload or potentially execute arbitrary code with root privileges. This vulnerability affects all firmware releases of the Cisco CVR100W Wireless-N VPN Router prior to Firmware Release 1.0.1.22. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCuz72642.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the UPnP service of Cisco CVR100W Wireless-N VPN Router allows unauthenticated, Layer 2-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code with root privileges or cause device reload. The flaw stems from incomplete range validation of UPnP input data, enabling specially crafted malicious packets to overflow buffers and gain code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0.30= 1.0.1.9= 1.0.1.19= 1.0.2.6= 1.0.3.10= 1.0.4.10= 1.0.4.14= 1.0.5.4= 1.0.5.4\(gd\)= 1.0.5.5= 1.0.5.6= 1.0.5.8= 0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router web interface or CLI and confirm the model number is Cisco CVR100W Wireless-N VPN RouterAffected if Device is not a Cisco CVR100W (different models are not affected by this specific CVE)
-
Check the installed firmware versionNavigate to the router's web interface (typically at 192.168.1.1) and look in the Administration or Status section for the firmware version. Alternatively, use the CLI command 'show version' if accessibleAffected if Firmware version matches one of these: 1.0.0.30, 1.0.1.9, 1.0.1.19, 1.0.2.6, 1.0.3.10, 1.0.4.10, 1.0.4.14, 1.0.5.4, 1.0.5.4(gd), 1.0.5.5, 1.0.5.6, 1.0.5.8, or 1.0.0.2
-
Verify if UPnP service is enabledIn the router web interface, go to the UPnP settings page (usually under Advanced or Port Forwarding settings) and check whether Universal Plug and Play is turned on. If accessing via CLI, look for 'upnp enable' in the configurationAffected if UPnP is enabled - the vulnerability is only exploitable when the UPnP service is running
You are affected if your Cisco CVR100W runs any of the listed vulnerable firmware versions AND has UPnP service enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Cisco CVR100W firmware to Release 1.0.1.22 or later. If immediate upgrade is not feasible, disable UPnP on the device as a temporary mitigation to reduce attack surface.
Firmware Release 1.0.1.22 or later
- Access the Cisco CVR100W Wireless-N VPN Router web-based management interface
- Navigate to the Administration or System settings section
- Locate the firmware upgrade option
- Download firmware version 1.0.1.22 or later from the official Cisco support website
- Upload the firmware file to the router
- Wait for the upgrade process to complete and the device to reboot automatically
- Verify the new firmware version is installed after reboot
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-3882 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-3882 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data