CVE-2017-4925
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVMware ESXi 6.5 without patch ESXi650-201707101-SG, ESXi 6.0 without patch ESXi600-201706101-SG, ESXi 5.5 without patch ESXi550-201709101-SG, Workstation (12.x before 12.5.3), Fusion (8.x before 8.5.4) contain a NULL pointer dereference vulnerability. This issue occurs when handling guest RPC requests. Successful exploitation of this issue may allow attackers with normal user privileges to crash their VMs.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in VMware ESXi 6.5/6.0/5.5, Workstation 12.x before 12.5.3, and Fusion 8.x before 8.5.4 when handling guest RPC requests. An attacker with normal user privileges in a guest VM can exploit this to crash their VM, causing a denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.5= 6.0= 6.5>= 12.0.0, < 12.5.3>= 12.0.0, < 12.5.3>= 8.0.0, < 8.5.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify VMware product typeDetermine if the host runs ESXi, Workstation, or Fusion. On ESXi, run 'vmware -v' or check the vSphere Client. On Workstation/Fusion, check Help > About VMware.Affected if The host runs ESXi 5.5, 6.0, or 6.5; Workstation 12.x before 12.5.3; or Fusion 8.x before 8.5.4.
-
Check ESXi version (if applicable)Run 'vmware -v' on the ESXi host console or query via esxcli: 'esxcli system version get'.Affected if Version is exactly 5.5, 6.0, or 6.5.
-
Check Workstation version (if applicable)Open Workstation, go to Help > About VMware Workstation, or run 'vmware -v' from command line.Affected if Version starts with 12.0.0 through 12.5.2.
-
Check Fusion version (if applicable)Open Fusion, go to VMware Fusion menu > About VMware Fusion, or run 'vmware -v' from terminal.Affected if Version starts with 8.0.0 through 8.5.3.
-
Verify guest VM RPC functionality is in useThe vulnerability triggers when guest VMs send RPC requests to the host. This feature is active when VMware Tools are installed and the guest has normal user privileges.Affected if Guest VMs with VMware Tools are running on the affected host version.
You are affected if your VMware product matches one of the listed version ranges and guest VMs with VMware Tools are running on the host.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data8.5.412.5.3
Apply the vendor-supplied patches: ESXi650-201707101-SG, ESXi600-201706101-SG, ESXi550-201709101-SG for ESXi; Workstation 12.5.3 or later; Fusion 8.5.4 or later.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-4925 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-4925 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data