SocialminerApplication · Cisco

CVE-2017-6702

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2017-07-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the web framework of Cisco SocialMiner could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web interface of an affected system. More Information: CSCve15285. Known Affected Releases: 11.5(1).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the web framework of Cisco SocialMiner. An unauthenticated, remote attacker can inject malicious scripts into the web interface that will be executed in the context of a user's session when they access the affected interface.

MitigationApply the vendor patch for CSCve15285 when available. As a temporary mitigation, consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to filter malicious XSS payloads, and instruct users to avoid clicking untrusted links.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
SocialminerApplication
Affected:= 11.5\(1\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cisco SocialMiner installation
    Check system for Cisco SocialMiner by reviewing installed software packages, looking for SocialMiner processes running (ps aux | grep -i socialminer), or checking for the product in system inventory
    Affected if SocialMiner is not installed on the system - not affected. If found, proceed to version check.
  2. Identify installed SocialMiner version
    Access the SocialMiner administrative interface or use CLI to query the version. Typically found in the About page of the web UI, or via command line: run show version or show system health in the SocialMiner CLI
    Affected if The installed version is 11.5(1) - this version is affected by the XSS vulnerability. Other versions are not affected unless they appear in the affected range.
  3. Verify web framework is accessible
    Test network accessibility to the SocialMiner web interface port (default HTTPS 443 or configured port) from network locations. Check if the web service is running and exposed
    Affected if The web interface is externally accessible or accessible to untrusted users - the XSS can be triggered. Even if not externally accessible, internal users could still be targeted.
  4. Check for evidence of XSS exploitation
    Review SocialMiner web server logs for suspicious URL patterns containing script tags, javascript:, or other XSS payloads in request parameters. Look in access logs for unusual query strings
    Affected if Suspicious XSS patterns found in logs indicate potential exploitation attempts against the vulnerable endpoint

You are affected if Cisco SocialMiner version 11.5(1) is installed AND the web interface is accessible to users or attackers who could trigger the XSS payload.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch for CSCve15285 when available. As a temporary mitigation, consider deploying a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to filter malicious XSS payloads, and instruct users to avoid clicking untrusted links.

Fix this in Socialminer Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-6702 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-6702 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data