CVE-2017-7345
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedNetApp OnCommand Performance Manager and OnCommand Unified Manager for Clustered Data ONTAP before 7.1P1 improperly bind the Java Management Extension Remote Method Invocation (aka JMX RMI) service to the network, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceNetApp OnCommand Performance Manager and Unified Manager for Clustered Data ONTAP versions before 7.1P1 incorrectly bind the Java Management Extension Remote Method Invocation (JMX RMI) service to the network interface, exposing it to remote attackers who can exploit it to obtain sensitive information through unspecified vectors.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed NetApp productLocate OnCommand Performance Manager or Unified Manager for Clustered Data ONTAP installation directories or running processes on the systemAffected if Either product is installed on the system
-
Check product versionUse the product's version command or check version file in installation directoryAffected if The installed version is 7.1 or earlier (before 7.1P1)
-
Verify JMX RMI port exposureCheck if port 1099 (or other RMI ports) is listening and bound to a non-loopback network interface using netstat or similar network inspection toolAffected if Port 1099 or RMI ports are bound to 0.0.0.0 or an external IP rather than localhost only
-
Test remote network accessibilityFrom an external host, attempt to connect to the JMX RMI port on the affected systemAffected if The JMX RMI service is reachable from remote network locations
The system is affected if NetApp OnCommand Performance Manager or Unified Manager for Clustered Data ONTAP version 7.1 or earlier is installed and the JMX RMI service (port 1099) is exposed to network interfaces beyond localhost.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to version 7.1P1 or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to JMX RMI ports (typically port 1099 and related RMI ports) using firewall rules or network segmentation to prevent unauthorized remote access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-7345 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-7345 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data