CVE-2017-8005
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe EMC RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, RSA Via Lifecycle and Governance, and RSA IMG products (RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle versions 7.0.1, 7.0.2, all patch levels; RSA Via Lifecycle and Governance version 7.0, all patch levels; RSA Identity Management and Governance (RSA IMG) versions 6.9.1, all patch levels) are affected by multiple stored cross-site scripting vulnerabilities. Remote authenticated malicious users could potentially inject arbitrary HTML code to the application.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a stored (persistent) cross-site scripting vulnerability in RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, RSA Via Lifecycle and Governance, and RSA IMG products. Authenticated malicious users can inject arbitrary HTML/JavaScript code that gets permanently stored in the application and executes when other users access the affected pages.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0.1= 7.0.1.1= 7.0.1.2= 7.0.1.3= 7.0.2= 7.0.2.1= 6.9.1= 6.9.1.1= 6.9.1.2= 6.9.1.3= 6.9.1.4= 6.9.1.5= 6.9.1.6= 6.9.1.7= 6.9.1.8= 6.9.1.9= 6.9.1.10= 6.9.1.11= 7.0= 7.0.0.1= 7.0.0.2= 7.0.0.3= 7.0.0.4= 7.0.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed RSA product and versionLocate the product version through the administrative console, about page, or system information file. For RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, this is typically found in the admin UI under System > Settings > System Information, or in the installation directory's version file.Affected if The product name matches one of: RSA Identity Governance and Lifecycle, RSA Via Lifecycle and Governance, or RSA IMG, AND the version matches any of the listed affected versions (7.0.1 through 7.0.2.1 for Identity Governance; 6.9.1 through 6.9.1.11 for Identity Management and Governance; 7.0 through
-
Confirm the web application interface is activeVerify the RSA web interface is accessible by attempting to reach the application URL (typically https://hostname/aveksa/ or similar). This vulnerability affects web-based stored XSS, so the application must be running.Affected if The RSA web application is accessible and accepts authenticated user sessions.
-
Determine if user authentication is enabledCheck whether local or remote user authentication (LDAP, AD, etc.) is configured in the Identity Governance/Lifecycle system. This can be verified through the admin console under User Management or Security settings.Affected if User authentication is enabled and multiple users have access to the application, as the stored XSS payload would need to be viewed by other users to execute.
A user is affected if they are running any of the specific product versions listed AND the RSA web interface is active with authenticated user access, allowing stored malicious scripts to execute in other users' browsers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied patches for the affected versions and implement output encoding/sanitization for user-supplied input in the application.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-8005 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-8005 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data