CVE-2017-9553
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA design flaw in SYNO.API.Encryption in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) before 6.1.3-15152 allows remote attackers to bypass the encryption protection mechanism via the crafted version parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA design flaw in SYNO.API.Encryption in Synology DiskStation Manager (DSM) allows remote attackers to bypass the encryption protection mechanism by supplying a crafted version parameter. This enables attackers to potentially access encrypted data without proper authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 6.1.1-15101-4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check installed DSM versionLog into DSM and go to Control Panel > System > System Information, or run 'grep -i 'productversion' /etc/VERSION' via SSHAffected if The version is 6.1.1-15101-4 or lower
-
Verify SYNO.API.Encryption endpoint existsCheck if the API handler exists on the system by searching for 'SYNO.API.Encryption' in the DSM web interface files or API definitions (typically in /usr/syno/synoman/webapi/)Affected if The API module file is present on the system
-
Identify encrypted storage configurationCheck for encrypted shared folders or encrypted volumes in DSM: go to Control Panel > Shared Folder, or run 'ls -la /volume*/@encrypt*' via SSH to locate encrypted resourcesAffected if Encrypted shared folders or encrypted volumes are configured and accessible via the affected API
-
Confirm API is remotely accessibleTest if the SYNO.API.Encryption endpoint responds by making a request to 'webapi/entry.cgi?api=SYNO.API.Encryption&version=1' on the DSM hostAffected if The API endpoint is reachable from the network without authentication bypass
A user is affected if their DSM version is 6.1.1-15101-4 or lower AND they have encrypted shared folders or volumes accessible via the SYNO.API.Encryption interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade DSM to version 6.1.3-15152 or later to remediate this encryption bypass vulnerability.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2017-9553 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2017-9553 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data