JsnapyApplication · Juniper

CVE-2018-0023

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
JSNAPy is an open source python version of Junos Snapshot Administrator developed by Juniper available through github. The default configuration and sample files of JSNAPy automation tool versions prior to 1.3.0 are created world writable. This insecure file and directory permission allows unprivileged local users to alter the files under this directory including inserting operations not intended by the package maintainer, system administrator, or other users. This issue only affects users who downloaded and installed JSNAPy from github.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

JSNAPy versions prior to 1.3.0 create default configuration and sample files with world-writable (777) permissions. This allows any local unprivileged user to read, modify, or delete files in these directories, potentially injecting arbitrary operations into the automation tool's execution flow.

MitigationRestrict file permissions on JSNAPy config/sample directories (chmod 755 for dirs, 644 for files) to remove world-writable access, or upgrade to JSNAPy 1.3.0+ which contains the corrected default permissions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JsnapyApplication
Affected:< 1.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Determine installed JSNAPy version
    Run 'jsnapy --version' or check the version file in the JSNAPy installation directory (typically in site-packages or /opt/jsnapy)
    Affected if Version is lower than 1.3.0
  2. Locate JSNAPy config directory
    Find the default configuration directory - typically ~/.jsnapy/ or /etc/jsnapy/ where JSNAPy stores its config files
    Affected if This directory exists and was created by JSNAPy prior to version 1.3.0
  3. Check config directory permissions
    Run 'ls -ld ~/.jsnapy/' or the identified config directory path to view permissions
    Affected if Directory shows rwxrwxrwx (777) permissions indicating world-writable access
  4. Check config file permissions
    Run 'ls -la ~/.jsnapy/' to list all files in the config directory and review their permission bits
    Affected if Any .yml, .yaml, or sample files show rw-rw-rw- (666) or similar world-writable permissions
  5. Check sample templates directory permissions
    Locate and inspect the templates/samples directory (commonly in /opt/jsnapy/samples or within the installation) for world-writable permissions
    Affected if Sample files or templates have world-writable permissions

A user is affected if JSNAPy version is below 1.3.0 AND the config/sample directories or files within them have world-writable (777/666) permission bits set, allowing unprivileged local access.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.3.0 or later
Fixed in 1.3.0
Interim mitigation

Restrict file permissions on JSNAPy config/sample directories (chmod 755 for dirs, 644 for files) to remove world-writable access, or upgrade to JSNAPy 1.3.0+ which contains the corrected default permissions.

Fix this in Jsnapy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0023 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0023 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data