CVE-2018-0140
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the spam quarantine of Cisco Email Security Appliance and Cisco Content Security Management Appliance could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to download any message from the spam quarantine by modifying browser string information. The vulnerability is due to a lack of verification of authenticated user accounts. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by modifying browser strings to see messages submitted by other users to the spam quarantine within their company. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvg39759, CSCvg42295.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the spam quarantine feature of Cisco Email Security Appliance and Cisco Content Security Management Appliance. An authenticated attacker can download arbitrary messages from the spam quarantine by modifying browser string information (likely message IDs or session tokens), because the application lacks proper verification that the authenticated user is authorized to access the specific message being requested.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 9.8.0-112= 10.0.1-087= 11.0.0-274= 10.0.0-096= 10.1.0-037= 10.1.0-052= 11.0.0-115CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and versionLog into the Cisco Email Security Appliance or Content Security Management Appliance management interface and navigate to the System Administration > Software Upgrade or About page to confirm the exact firmware version installed.Affected if The installed version matches one of the affected version ranges: ESA firmware 9.8.0-112, 10.0.1-087, or 11.0.0-274; or SMA firmware 10.0.0-096, 10.1.0-037, 10.1.0-052, or 11.0.0-115.
-
Verify spam quarantine is enabledIn the ESA or SMA web interface, go to the Spam Quarantine section (typically under Mail Policies > Spam Quarantine) or the Quarantine > Spam Quarantine menu to determine if the spam quarantine feature is currently enabled for end-user or administrative access.Affected if The spam quarantine feature is enabled and accessible to users or administrators.
-
Confirm management interface accessibilityDetermine if the ESA or SMA management web interface (GUI) is reachable from network segments outside the trusted internal network. Check the interface bindings in Network > IP Interfaces to see which interfaces the management GUI is bound to, or verify network access control lists.Affected if The management interface is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.
-
Review quarantine access logsAccess the spam quarantine logs or message tracking logs through the GUI (Monitor > Message Tracking) or CLI (grep commands in the logs directory) to look for access patterns where message IDs or request parameters suggest users accessed messages outside their normal quarantine scope.Affected if Logs show messages were accessed by users who did not own or should not have had access to those specific messages.
You are affected if you run an ESA or SMA firmware version within the listed affected ranges AND the spam quarantine feature is enabled and accessible, regardless of whether the management interface is externally reachable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Cisco security updates/patches addressing CSCvg39759 and CSCvg42295. Until patches are applied, restrict network access to the ESA/SMA management interfaces and monitor for unauthorized access to quarantine messages.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0140 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0140 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data