Secure Firewall Threat DefenseApplication · Cisco

CVE-2018-0244

MEDIUM · 5.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-04-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.2.3 or later.
See remediation →
67/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the detection engine of Cisco Firepower System Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass a configured file action policy to drop the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol if a malware file is detected. The vulnerability is due to how the SMB protocol handles a case in which a large file transfer fails. This case occurs when some pieces of the file are successfully transferred to the remote endpoint, but ultimately the file transfer fails and is reset. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SMB file transfer request through the targeted device. An exploit could allow the attacker to pass an SMB file that contains malware, which the device is configured to block. This vulnerability affects Cisco Firepower System Software when one or more file action policies are configured, on software releases prior to 6.2.3. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvc20141.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In Cisco Firepower System Software, the detection engine fails to properly block malware-containing SMB files when a large file transfer partially succeeds before failing and being reset. An attacker can exploit this by sending a crafted SMB file transfer that bypasses configured file action policies designed to drop SMB files identified as malware.

MitigationUpgrade Cisco Firepower System Software to version 6.2.3 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Secure Firewall Threat DefenseApplication
Affected:< 6.2.3

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm the product is Cisco Firepower Threat Defense
    Identify the installed Cisco product to ensure it is the Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) platform, not another Firepower product
    Affected if The device is not a Cisco Firepower Threat Defense appliance
  2. Determine the installed software version
    Access the Firepower Management Center or the FTD CLI and retrieve the current software version. Compare this version number to the fixed release 6.2.3
    Affected if The installed version is any release prior to 6.2.3 (for example, 6.2.2, 6.2.1, 6.2.0, or earlier)
  3. Verify SMB file inspection is enabled
    Check the Firepower policy configuration to confirm that file inspection for SMB traffic is turned on. This is typically configured in the access control or file policy settings
    Affected if SMB file inspection is enabled and the version is below 6.2.3
  4. Confirm file action policies for malware are configured
    Review the file policy rules that define actions (such as block, alert) for SMB files identified as malware. Ensure these policies are applied to the relevant access control rule
    Affected if File action policies for blocking malware in SMB are configured and the version is below 6.2.3

A user is affected if they are running any version of Cisco Firepower Threat Defense prior to 6.2.3 with SMB file inspection and malware blocking policies enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.2.3 or later
Fixed in 6.2.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Cisco Firepower System Software to version 6.2.3 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Fix this in Secure Firewall Threat Defense Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0244 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0244 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data