CVE-2018-0284
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the local status page functionality of the Cisco Meraki MR, MS, MX, Z1, and Z3 product lines could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to modify device configuration files. The vulnerability occurs when handling requests to the local status page. An exploit could allow the attacker to establish an interactive session to the device with elevated privileges. The attacker could then use the elevated privileges to further compromise the device or obtain additional configuration data from the device that is being exploited.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the local status page functionality of Cisco Meraki MR, MS, MX, Z1, and Z3 product lines allows an authenticated, remote attacker to modify device configuration files and establish an interactive session with elevated privileges, potentially leading to further device compromise and data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 24.13< 25.11< 10.20< 9.37< 13.32< 14.25< 15.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Meraki device modelAccess the Meraki Dashboard or check the physical device label to determine if the device is an MR (wireless), MS (switch), MX (security appliance), Z1, or Z3 model.Affected if The device is one of these models: MR, MS, MX, Z1, or Z3.
-
Determine the firmware versionLog into the Meraki Dashboard, navigate to the device inventory, and check the firmware version displayed for the affected device. Alternatively, access the device local status page and review the firmware version shown there.Affected if The firmware version falls within the affected ranges: MR 24 < 24.13, MR 25 < 25.11, MS 10 < 10.20, MS 9 < 9.37, MX 13 < 13.32, MX 14 < 14.25, MX 15 < 15.7.
-
Verify if local status page is accessibleAttempt to access the local status page of the Meraki device from a remote network location. The local status page is typically accessed via HTTP/HTTPS to the device's management IP address. Check if the page loads without requiring VPN or local network access.Affected if The local status page is accessible from untrusted networks, meaning the device is affected if other conditions are met.
-
Confirm authentication requirements for local status pageReview the device configuration in the Meraki Dashboard under Organization > Settings > Local status page access. Check whether the local status page requires authentication or is open to anonymous access.Affected if The local status page is enabled and accessible without proper authentication controls, making the device vulnerable to exploitation.
A device is affected if it is an MR, MS, MX, Z1, or Z3 model running a firmware version lower than the fixed releases AND the local status page is accessible to untrusted networks or lacks adequate authentication controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data9.3710.2013.32
Restrict access to the local status page to trusted management networks only, ensure strong authentication controls are in place for administrative access, and apply vendor patches when available. Consider network segmentation to limit exposure of management interfaces.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0284 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0284 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data