Unified Communications Manager Im And Presence ServiceApplication · Cisco

CVE-2018-0363

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-06-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service (formerly CUPS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions on a targeted device via a web browser and with the privileges of the user. Cisco Bug IDs: CSCvi55878.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery) vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service allows unauthenticated remote attackers to trick authenticated administrators into performing unintended actions by luring them to click malicious links. The root cause is missing or insufficient CSRF token validation in the web interface.

MitigationApply the Cisco vendor patch for CSCvi55878 when released. In the interim, educate administrators about avoiding untrusted links and consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Unified Communications Manager Im And Presence ServiceApplication
Affected:= 11.5\(1\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service is installed
    Locate the product on your system or check your inventory of deployed Cisco collaboration software. This is a separate component from standard Cisco Unified Communications Manager.
    Affected if The product is not installed on your environment.
  2. Check the installed version of the IM & Presence Service
    Access the product via its admin web interface or use the CLI command 'utils system version' or 'show version' depending on your access method, then compare the displayed version to 11.5(1).
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 11.5(1).
  3. Verify the web-based management interface is accessible
    Attempt to reach the admin web interface via HTTPS on the standard ports (typically 8443 or 443) for the IM & Presence Service. If the interface is unreachable from your network perspective, the CSRF attack surface is reduced.
    Affected if The web management interface is exposed and accessible to users who could be targeted with malicious links.
  4. Confirm administrator accounts exist and can access the web interface
    Log into the web-based management interface with an administrator account. CSRF attacks require authenticated administrators to be tricked into clicking malicious links.
    Affected if There are active administrator accounts with access to the web management interface.

You are affected if you have Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM & Presence Service version 11.5(1) running with its web-based management interface accessible to users who could be targeted.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco vendor patch for CSCvi55878 when released. In the interim, educate administrators about avoiding untrusted links and consider network segmentation to limit exposure of the management interface.

Fix this in Unified Communications Manager Im And Presence Service Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-0363 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-0363 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data