CVE-2018-1000026
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLinux Linux kernel version at least v4.8 onwards, probably well before contains a Insufficient input validation vulnerability in bnx2x network card driver that can result in DoS: Network card firmware assertion takes card off-line. This attack appear to be exploitable via An attacker on a must pass a very large, specially crafted packet to the bnx2x card. This can be done from an untrusted guest VM..
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInsufficient input validation in the bnx2x network card driver allows an attacker on an untrusted guest VM to send a specially crafted large packet that triggers a firmware assertion, causing the network card to go offline (Denial of Service). The driver fails to properly validate packet size or format before passing it to the firmware.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.6.12, < 4.4.181>= 4.5.0, < 4.9.159>= 4.10, < 4.14.102>= 4.15, < 4.16= 12.04= 14.04= 16.04= 17.10= 7.0= 7.0= 7.0= 7.0= 8.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine if bnx2x driver is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep bnx2x' to see if the bnx2x kernel module is currently loaded in memoryAffected if The bnx2x module is loaded and running
-
Identify the running Linux kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to get the kernel version, then compare it against the affected ranges: < 4.4.181, 4.5.0 to < 4.9.159, 4.10 to < 4.14.102, 4.15 to < 4.16Affected if The kernel version falls within any of the affected version ranges
-
Confirm bnx2x driver file existsCheck for the presence of the driver file using 'ls /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x*' or similar path under /lib/modulesAffected if The bnx2x driver binary exists in the kernel modules directory for the running kernel
-
Determine if system is running as a virtualization hostRun 'systemd-detect-virt' or check 'lspci | grep -i network' to see if bnx2x network hardware is physically present or passed through to VMsAffected if The bnx2x driver is handling network traffic from virtual machines (the attack vector requires untrusted guest VMs to send packets to the physical network card)
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable kernel version with the bnx2x driver loaded and exposes the network interface to untrusted guest virtual machines.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.4.1814.9.1594.14.102
Apply Linux kernel updates that include the bnx2x driver fix for proper input validation; in virtualized environments, restrict or monitor untrusted guest VM network access to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,784.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1000026 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1000026 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data