JamfApplication

CVE-2018-10465

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-01-07
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 10.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Jamf Pro 10.x before 10.3.0 has Incorrect Access Control. Jamf Pro user accounts and groups with access to log in to Jamf Pro had full access to endpoints in the Universal API (UAPI), regardless of account privileges or privilege sets. An authenticated Jamf Pro account without required privileges could be used to perform CRUD actions (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) on UAPI endpoints, which could result in unauthorized information disclosure, compromised data integrity, and data loss. For a full listing of available UAPI endpoints and associated CRUD actions you can navigate to /uapi/doc in your instance of Jamf Pro.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Jamf Pro 10.x before 10.3.0 contains an Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in the Universal API (UAPI). Authenticated users with basic login access could perform full CRUD operations (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE) on UAPI endpoints regardless of their assigned privilege sets, allowing privilege escalation and unauthorized data access/modification.

MitigationUpgrade Jamf Pro to version 10.3.0 or later to remediate the access control bypass. Review UAPI access logs for suspicious activity from affected versions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JamfApplication
Affected:>= 10.0.0, < 10.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Jamf Pro version
    Access Jamf Pro Admin console and navigate to Settings > System > About, or run: grep -i version /Library/JSS/Config/jss_config.plist 2>/dev/null
    Affected if The version is 10.0.0 through 10.2.x (any version >= 10.0.0 and < 10.3.0)
  2. Verify UAPI endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access a UAPI endpoint (e.g., /uapi/auth) using an account with Basic privileges via curl or API client: curl -k -u basicuser:password https://yourjamfserver:8443/uapi/auth
    Affected if The request returns a successful response rather than a 403 Forbidden, indicating UAPI is accessible without proper privilege enforcement
  3. Confirm user privilege assignment
    In Jamf Pro Admin, go to Users > User Accounts and verify a test account is assigned to a limited privilege set (e.g., Auditor or Custom with restricted permissions)
    Affected if A user with limited privileges can successfully execute GET, POST, PUT, or DELETE operations on UAPI endpoints they should not have access to
  4. Review UAPI access logs
    In Jamf Pro, navigate to Management Settings > System > API Status and Logging, or inspect /var/log/jss.log for UAPI activity. Search for operations performed by users with basic-level roles
    Affected if Logs show CRUD operations from basic users on endpoints outside their assigned privilege scope

You are affected if Jamf Pro version is 10.0.0 through 10.2.x AND the UAPI is accessible to users with basic privilege sets who can perform operations beyond their intended permissions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 10.3.0 or later
Fixed in 10.3.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Jamf Pro to version 10.3.0 or later to remediate the access control bypass. Review UAPI access logs for suspicious activity from affected versions.

Fix this in Jamf Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-10465 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-10465 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data