JamfApplication

CVE-2019-17076

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-01-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.15.0 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Jamf Pro 9.x and 10.x before 10.15.1. Deserialization of untrusted data when parsing JSON in several APIs may cause Denial of Service (DoS), remote code execution (RCE), and/or deletion of files on the Jamf Pro server.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Jamf Pro versions 9.x and 10.x before 10.15.1 insecurely deserialize untrusted JSON data in multiple API endpoints, enabling remote attackers to potentially execute arbitrary code on the server or delete files.

MitigationUpgrade Jamf Pro to version 10.15.1 or later to remediate the deserialization vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
JamfApplication
Affected:>= 9.4, <= 9.101.4>= 10.0.0, <= 10.15.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Jamf Pro version
    Log into the Jamf Pro Admin Console and navigate to Settings > System Settings > About, or query the Jamf Pro server API at /JSSCheckVersion using: curl -k https://your-jamf-hostname/JSSCheckVersion
    Affected if The displayed version falls within 9.4 to 9.101.4, or 10.0.0 to 10.15.0 (inclusive)
  2. Confirm Jamf Pro API endpoints are network-accessible
    Test connectivity to common Jamf API ports from external locations: curl -k -o /dev/null -s -w '%{http_code}' https://your-jamf-hostname:8443/api/ (port 443 or 8443 are typical)
    Affected if HTTP 401/403 responses indicate the API is reachable; open internet exposure increases risk
  3. Verify API JSON deserialization endpoints are active
    Send a test JSON payload to known API endpoints such as /api/v1/computers or /api/v1/mobile-devices and inspect the response headers: curl -k -X POST https://your-jamf-hostname:8443/api/v1/computers -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d '{}' -w '\n%{http_code}'
    Affected if The server accepts JSON content-type requests and returns API responses, indicating the vulnerable deserialization code path is active
  4. Check for evidence of exploitation attempts in Jamf Pro logs
    Review Jamf Pro server logs located in /Library/Logs/Jamf or the Tomcat logs directory for deserialization-related errors or suspicious API activity patterns
    Affected if Log entries show deserialization exceptions, unexpected JSON structures, or API calls from unexpected sources

You are affected if your Jamf Pro version is 9.4 through 9.101.4 or 10.0.0 through 10.15.0 AND the API endpoints are network-accessible, since the insecure JSON deserialization flaw in those versions can be triggered remotely.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.15.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Jamf Pro to version 10.15.1 or later to remediate the deserialization vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

Jamf Pro 10.15.1 or later

  1. Backup the Jamf Pro database and configuration files before proceeding with any upgrade
  2. Review the official Jamf Pro upgrade documentation at resources.jamf.com for your current version
  3. Upgrade Jamf Pro to version 10.15.1 or later (for 9.x versions, you may need to first upgrade to a compatible 10.x version)
  4. After upgrade, verify the Jamf Pro services started successfully
  5. Confirm the deserialization vulnerability is resolved by testing the affected API endpoints
Caveat Review release notes for any breaking changes between your current version and 10.15.1; ensure compatibility with your macOS/iOS device management workflows

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Jamf Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,080
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-17076 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-17076 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data