CVE-2018-12929
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedntfs_read_locked_inode in the ntfs.ko filesystem driver in the Linux kernel 4.15.0 allows attackers to trigger a use-after-free read and possibly cause a denial of service (kernel oops or panic) via a crafted ntfs filesystem.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA use-after-free vulnerability exists in the ntfs_read_locked_inode function within the ntfs.ko filesystem driver of Linux kernel 4.15.0. Attackers can trigger this by mounting a specially crafted malicious NTFS filesystem, causing the kernel to read from freed memory and potentially trigger a kernel oops or panic, resulting in denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.15= 16.04.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if NTFS kernel module is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep ntfs' to see if ntfs.ko is currently loaded in memoryAffected if The ntfs.ko module is loaded and the kernel version is 4.15.x or the system is Ubuntu 16.04.4
-
Check kernel versionRun 'uname -r' to display the running kernel versionAffected if The kernel version starts with 4.15 (e.g., 4.15.0-xx) since the vulnerability exists in this specific version
-
Check if NTFS support is built into the kernelCheck /proc/filesystems for 'ntfs' or examine kernel config at /boot/config-$(uname -r) for CONFIG_NTFS_FS=y (not =m)Affected if NTFS support is compiled directly into the kernel (not as a module) on a 4.15 kernel
-
Verify Ubuntu version if applicableOn Ubuntu systems, run 'cat /etc/lsb-release' or 'dpkg -l | grep linux-image' to identify the specific kernel package versionAffected if System is Ubuntu 16.04.4 with the original 4.15 kernel package installed
The system is affected if it runs kernel 4.15.x and has NTFS filesystem support either loaded as a module or compiled into the kernel, enabling a malicious NTFS mount to trigger the use-after-free.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the Linux kernel to a version that includes the fix for this vulnerability. If NTFS filesystem support is not required, consider disabling or unloading the ntfs.ko module to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-12929 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-12929 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data