CVE-2018-13924
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLack of check to prevent the buffer length taking negative values can lead to stack overflow. in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon IoT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in IPQ8074, MDM9150, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9615, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8909W, MSM8996AU, QCA6174A, QCA8081, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, Qualcomm 215, SD 210/SD 212/SD 205, SD 425, SD 427, SD 430, SD 435, SD 439 / SD 429, SD 450, SD 615/16/SD 415, SD 625, SD 632, SD 636, SD 650/52, SD 665, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 730, SD 820, SD 820A, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SD 855, SD 8CX, SDA660, SDM439, SDM630, SDM660, SDX20, Snapdragon_High_Med_2016, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA missing validation check allows buffer length parameters to take negative values. When a negative length is used in memory copy operations, it gets interpreted as a large unsigned integer, causing the function to write far beyond the intended buffer boundary, resulting in stack overflow. This occurs in the proprietary firmware of multiple Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset generations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset model in your deviceCheck device documentation, kernel logs ('dmesg'), or hardware specifications for the chipset identifier. Look for: Ipq8074, Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, or Mdm9640.Affected if Your device uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipset models (all versions affected)
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the device's administrative interface or use commands like 'cat /proc/version', 'firmware version', or vendor-specific tools to retrieve the current firmware build. Compare against the affected product list.Affected if Firmware version belongs to any of the listed chipset models (all versions are affected per the advisory)
-
Identify if the vulnerable code path is reachableThis vulnerability exists in the proprietary firmware's memory copy operations. Check if your device's firmware implements the vulnerable function handling buffer length parameters. Since this is in closed-source firmware, you would need vendor confirmation or binary analysis tools to confirm specific code paths.Affected if The specific firmware module processing buffer length parameters is present and actively used on the device
Your environment is affected if you are running any firmware version on one of the listed Qualcomm chipset models (Ipq8074, Mdm9150, Mdm9206, Mdm9607, Mdm9615, Mdm9625, Mdm9635m, Mdm9640), as all versions of these chipsets contain the missing validation vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-supplied firmware updates from Qualcomm and subsequent device manufacturer OTA updates. In the interim, network segmentation and minimizing exposed attack surface can reduce exploitation likelihood.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $13,312.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-13924 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-13924 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data