CVE-2019-10540
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedBuffer overflow in WLAN NAN function due to lack of check of count value received in NAN availability attribute in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer Electronics Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in IPQ8074, MSM8996AU, QCA6174A, QCA6574AU, QCA8081, QCA9377, QCA9379, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, SD 636, SD 665, SD 675, SD 712 / SD 710 / SD 670, SD 730, SD 820, SD 835, SD 845 / SD 850, SD 855, SD 8CX, SDA660, SDM630, SDM660, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in the WLAN NAN (Neighbor Awareness Networking) function. The issue stems from missing validation of the 'count' value in the NAN availability attribute, allowing specially crafted input to overflow a buffer and potentially execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the wireless chipset modelCheck the device specifications, kernel logs, or system info for the Qualcomm chipset identifier (ipq8074, msm8996au, qca6174a, qca6574au, qca8081, qca9377, qca9379, or qcs404)Affected if The device uses any of the listed affected chipset models
-
Check the wireless firmware versionQuery the wireless firmware version via `iw version`, `wpa_supplicant -v`, or check `/proc/version` for kernel and firmware stringsAffected if The firmware version cannot be determined or matches the affected chipset list
-
Verify NAN feature statusInspect wireless configuration files (typically in `/etc/config/wireless`, `/etc/hostapd.conf`, or via `iw` commands like `iw dev <interface> info`) for NAN, 11s, or Neighbor Discovery settingsAffected if NAN/Neighbor Awareness Networking is explicitly enabled in the wireless configuration
-
Check for NAN-related serviceLook for NAN daemon processes (nanod, nan-daemon) or services via `ps aux | grep -i nan` and check if the NAN interface exists via `ip link show`Affected if A NAN-specific network interface or service is present and active
-
Review system logs for NAN crashesExamine kernel logs (`dmesg`, `/var/log/messages`, `journalctl -k`) for NAN-related buffer overflow warnings, memory corruption errors, or unexpected rebootsAffected if Logs contain NAN-related crashes, heap overflow warnings, or memory corruption entries
If the device incorporates any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets and has NAN functionality enabled, the environment is likely affected by this buffer overflow vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied firmware updates for affected Snapdragon chipsets. Until patches are available, disable NAN/Neighbor Discovery functionality in wireless settings as a workaround.
- Check Qualcomm's official security advisories and firmware release notes for CVE-2019-10540
- Contact the device manufacturer (而非Qualcomm) to obtain patched firmware for your specific device model
- Apply the manufacturer-provided firmware update that addresses the NAN buffer overflow vulnerability
- Verify the patch has been applied by checking the firmware version or using vendor verification tools
- For devices that are end-of-life and no longer receive updates, consider replacing the device with a newer model that has security support
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-10540 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-10540 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data