CVE-2018-1434
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM Spectrum Virtualize and IBM FlashSystem products ( 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.6.1, 7.7, 7.7.1, 7.8, 7.8.1, 8.1, and 8.1.1) are vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 139474.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM SAN Volume Controller, Storwize, Spectrum Virtualize, and FlashSystem storage products allows attackers to execute unauthorized actions by tricking authenticated users into submitting malicious requests. The vulnerability affects versions 6.1 through 8.1.1 across multiple product families.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the storage product modelAccess the device via SSH or console and run the command to display system information. For IBM Storwize, use 'lssystem' or check the GUI welcome page. For SAN Volume Controller, use 'lsnodecfg' or similar command.Affected if The product is one of: Storwize V7000, V5000, V3700, V3500, V9000, SAN Volume Controller, Spectrum Virtualize, or Spectrum Virtualize for Public Cloud.
-
Check the installed firmware versionRun the command to display the code level. In the CLI, use 'lsmcode -all' or check 'showversion' depending on the product. In the GUI, go to Settings > System > Updates or the About page.Affected if The version matches any of these ranges: >= 6.1.0.0 and < 7.5.0.14; >= 7.7.0.0 and < 7.7.1.9; >= 7.8.0.0 and < 7.8.1.6; >= 8.1.1.0 and < 8.1.1.2; >= 8.1.2.0 and < 8.1.2.1.
-
Confirm the web management interface is enabledIn the GUI, verify you can access the login page at the device IP address via HTTPS. From CLI, check service status for the web server using 'lsservice' or similar command.Affected if The web interface is accessible and the user is logged in, because CSRF attacks require an authenticated session to the web management console.
You are affected if your device runs any of the listed IBM storage product families with firmware version falling within the vulnerable ranges and the web management interface is enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data7.5.0.147.7.1.97.8.1.6
Apply IBM-provided patches or upgrade to a fixed version as specified in IBM's security bulletin. Implement anti-CSRF tokens and SameSite cookie attributes in custom web interfaces if applicable.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1434 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1434 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data