CVE-2018-1438
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM SAN Volume Controller, IBM Storwize, IBM Spectrum Virtualize and IBM FlashSystem products ( 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 7.6.1, 7.7, 7.7.1, 7.8, 7.8.1, 8.1, and 8.1.1) web handler /DLSnap could allow an unauthenticated attacker to read arbitrary files on the system. IBM X-Force ID: 139566.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe /DLSnap web handler in IBM storage products (SAN Volume Controller, Storwize, Spectrum Virtualize, FlashSystem versions 6.1-8.1.1) contains a path traversal vulnerability allowing unauthenticated remote attackers to read arbitrary files on the system by manipulating file paths in the request.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1>= 6.1.0.0, < 7.5.0.14>= 7.7.0.0, < 7.7.1.9>= 7.8.0.0, < 7.8.1.6>= 8.1.1.0, < 8.1.1.2>= 8.1.2.0, < 8.1.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the IBM storage product modelAccess the system management GUI or CLI and determine the exact product model (e.g., Storwize V7000, SAN Volume Controller, Spectrum Virtualize)Affected if The product model is one of: Storwize V7000, V5000, V3700, V3500, V9000, SAN Volume Controller, Spectrum Virtualize, or Spectrum Virtualize for Public Cloud
-
Check the installed firmware versionIn the management GUI, go to Settings > System > Updates or use the CLI command 'lsfirmware' to retrieve the current firmware versionAffected if The firmware version is within these ranges: 6.1.0.0 to 7.5.0.13, 7.7.0.0 to 7.7.1.8, 7.8.0.0 to 7.8.1.5, 8.1.1.0 to 8.1.1.1, or 8.1.2.0 (any version below the fixed releases)
-
Confirm the web management interface is enabledVerify that the GUI service is running by accessing the product's web interface over HTTPS on port 443, or check via CLI that the gui_monitord service is activeAffected if The web management interface is reachable and the /DLSnap handler is available (this is enabled by default on affected versions)
-
Test for path traversal vulnerability exposureIf you have authorization, send a crafted request to /DLSnap with path traversal sequences (e.g., /DLSnap/..%2F..%2Fetc%2Fpasswd) to verify the vulnerability exists; otherwise, check network exposure of the management portAffected if The /DLSnap endpoint responds to path traversal requests or the management interface is exposed to untrusted networks without firewall protection
You are affected if your product model is one of the listed IBM storage systems AND your firmware version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND the web management interface is accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data7.5.0.147.7.1.97.8.1.6
Apply IBM's security patches for the affected versions. If patching is delayed, restrict network access to the management web interface using firewalls or ACLs to prevent unauthenticated access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1438 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1438 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data