CVE-2018-15387
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass certificate validation on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper certificate validation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying a system image signed with a crafted certificate to an affected device, bypassing the certificate validation. An exploit could allow an attacker to deploy a crafted system image.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco SD-WAN Solution allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to bypass certificate validation due to improper handling of certificate checks. An attacker can exploit this by supplying a system image signed with a crafted certificate, bypassing the validation mechanism and allowing deployment of a malicious system image.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 17.2.0, < 17.2.8= 18.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed SD-WAN software versionRun 'show version' or 'show software' command on the SD-WAN device CLI to obtain the running software versionAffected if The version is 17.2.0 through 17.2.7 (any version >= 17.2.0 but < 17.2.8), or exactly version 18.3.0
-
Verify if image signature validation is enabledCheck the SD-WAN configuration for image validation settings using 'show configuration' or review the image loading policiesAffected if Signature validation is disabled or set to bypass for system images
-
Review recently loaded system imagesUse 'show software history' or review image installation logs to list recently deployed system imagesAffected if Any system image was loaded from an untrusted or unauthorized source
-
Inspect certificate configurationRun 'show certificate' or 'show crypto' commands to examine installed certificates and validation policiesAffected if Non-default or unexpected certificates are present, or certificate chain validation appears weakened
-
Check for image verification statusRun 'show software integrity' or 'verify image' commands to confirm each deployed image's signature verification statusAffected if Any currently running or备用 system image shows as unsigned, invalid, or bypassed
A system is affected if it runs any SD-WAN version 17.2.0 through 17.2.7 or exactly 18.3.0 AND has image signature validation disabled, bypassed, or has accepted an unsigned/untrusted system image.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped17.2.8
Apply Cisco's patch for this vulnerability when available; ensure only images from trusted, validated sources are deployed to affected SD-WAN devices.
Cisco SD-WAN vManage version 17.2.8 or later (or any release above 18.3.0 if available)
- Identify the current Cisco SD-WAN vManage version by checking the system information or running 'show version' command
- Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade procedure
- Download Cisco SD-WAN release 17.2.8 or later from the Cisco software download portal
- Upload the new system image to the SD-WAN vManage controller
- Follow Cisco standard upgrade procedures: initiate the upgrade through vManage web interface or CLI using 'request software install' command
- Verify the upgrade completed successfully and the system is running the fixed version
- Confirm the certificate validation is now functioning properly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15387 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15387 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data