CVE-2018-15438
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack and perform arbitrary actions on an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface of the affected software. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to follow a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to use a web browser to perform arbitrary actions with the privileges of the user on an affected system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCisco Prime Collaboration Assurance's web-based management interface lacks sufficient CSRF protections, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to craft malicious links that, when clicked by an authenticated user, can trigger arbitrary actions on the affected system with the user's privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance installation and versionLocate the installation directory or check the application's 'about' or 'version' page in the web interface. Common paths: /opt/cisco/pcp or check the service banner on the web management port (typically 443 or 8443).Affected if The installed version is exactly 12.1 (any subversion like 12.1.0, 12.1.1, etc.)
-
Confirm the web-based management interface is accessibleAttempt to access the web interface URL (typically https://hostname:443/ or https://hostname:8443/) using a browser or curl. Look for the Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance login page.Affected if The web management interface responds and is reachable on the network.
-
Inspect web forms for anti-CSRF token presenceLog into the web interface, navigate to pages with state-changing operations (such as user management, system configuration, or any form submitting POST/PUT/DELETE requests). View the page source or intercept the HTTP response to check if forms contain hidden CSRF token fields (look for elements like 'csrfToken', 'csrf', 'token', or similar anti-CSRF parameters).Affected if Forms lack hidden CSRF token fields or tokens are missing from POST/PUT/DELETE requests.
-
Check for SameSite cookie attributesAfter logging in, inspect the session cookies set by the application (via browser dev tools or curl -v). Look for the 'SameSite' attribute on cookies.Affected if Session cookies do not have the SameSite attribute set, or it is set to 'None' without Secure flags.
If the installed version is Cisco Prime Collaboration Assurance 12.1 and the web interface forms lack anti-CSRF tokens, the environment is affected by CVE-2018-15438.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement anti-CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations (POST/PUT/DELETE requests), validate Origin/Referer headers server-side, and configure SameSite cookies; apply any available vendor patches.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15438 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15438 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data