CVE-2018-15471
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in xenvif_set_hash_mapping in drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c in the Linux kernel through 4.18.1, as used in Xen through 4.11.x and other products. The Linux netback driver allows frontends to control mapping of requests to request queues. When processing a request to set or change this mapping, some input validation (e.g., for an integer overflow) was missing or flawed, leading to OOB access in hash handling. A malicious or buggy frontend may cause the (usually privileged) backend to make out of bounds memory accesses, potentially resulting in one or more of privilege escalation, Denial of Service (DoS), or information leaks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability exists in the Linux kernel's Xen netback driver (drivers/net/xen-netback/hash.c) in the xenvif_set_hash_mapping function. The function lacks proper input validation, specifically for integer overflow checks, when processing requests from frontends to set or change request queue mappings. A malicious or buggy frontend can trigger out-of-bounds memory accesses in the privileged backend, potentially leading to privilege escalation, DoS, or information leaks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.7, < 4.9.133>= 4.10, < 4.14.76>= 4.15, < 4.18.14= 14.04= 16.04= 18.04= 18.10<= 4.11.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Xen virtualization environmentCheck if the system is running on Xen hypervisor or acting as Xen host: look for 'xen' in /proc/cpuinfo flags, check for /sys/hypervisor/ directory, or run 'xl list' (if xl toolstack is available) to list domains.Affected if System is NOT a Xen host (dom0 or driver domain); the vulnerability only affects the Xen netback driver in backend domains.
-
Confirm kernel version is within affected rangeRun 'uname -r' to get the kernel version, then compare against: 4.7 to <4.9.133, OR 4.10 to <4.14.76, OR 4.15 to <4.18.14. For Ubuntu, check /boot/vmlinuz-* files or 'dpkg -l linux-image-*'.Affected if Kernel version does NOT fall within any of the listed version ranges; unpatched kernels in these ranges are vulnerable.
-
Check if Xen netback driver is loadedRun 'lsmod | grep xenvif' to see if the xenvif (Xen virtual interface) module is loaded, or check 'modinfo xenvif' to verify driver presence. Also check 'ls -la /sys/module/xenvif' if the directory exists.Affected if The xenvif module is NOT loaded or present; the driver must be actively in use for the vulnerability to be exploitable.
-
Identify if system acts as Xen backendCheck if the system has active network backends: look for xen-netback in 'lsmod', check 'xl network-list <domid>' for domains with network vif interfaces, or inspect /var/log/xen/ for netback activity. A system with running guest VMs using paravirtual network interfaces is acting as a backend.Affected if System is NOT functioning as a Xen backend (no guest VMs with paravirtual network interfaces); the vulnerability requires a malicious or buggy frontend to communicate with this backend.
A system is affected only if it is a Xen host (dom0 or driver domain) running a vulnerable kernel version (4.7 to <4.9.133, 4.10 to <4.14.76, or 4.15 to <4.18.14) with the xenvif netback driver loaded and actively serving network requests to frontend VMs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data4.9.1334.14.764.18.14
Update the Linux kernel to a version beyond 4.18.1 that contains the fix for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, consider restricting or validating frontend VMs and disabling the hash mapping feature if not required.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15471 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15471 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data