CVE-2018-15904
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA10 ACOS Web Application Firewall (WAF) 2.7.1 and 2.7.2 before 2.7.2-P12, 4.1.0 before 4.1.0-P11, 4.1.1 before 4.1.1-P8, and 4.1.2 before 4.1.2-P4 mishandles the configured rules for blocking SQL injection attacks, aka A10-2017-0008.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe A10 ACOS Web Application Firewall contains a logic error in its SQL injection attack detection and blocking mechanism. The WAF fails to properly apply configured rules meant to filter/block SQL injection attempts, allowing malicious requests to pass through unprotected. This effectively defeats the purpose of the WAF for SQL injection protection.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.7.1= 2.7.2= 4.1.0= 4.1.1= 4.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify A10 ACOS WAF deploymentLocate A10 ACOS devices in your environment and confirm the Web Application Firewall module is active. Check via the ACOS management interface or network inventory.Affected if A10 ACOS WAF is deployed in your environment
-
Check ACOS versionAccess the ACOS management interface or CLI and retrieve the installed software version. Compare against the affected versions: 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 4.1.0, 4.1.1, 4.1.2Affected if The installed version matches one of the listed affected versions
-
Verify SQL injection WAF rules are configuredIn the ACOS WAF configuration, locate the SQL injection protection rules. Confirm rules are defined in the WAF policy.Affected if SQL injection protection rules exist in the WAF configuration
-
Confirm rule enforcement is activeCheck the WAF policy status to verify that SQL injection rules are enabled and applied to protected virtual servers. Review the WAF logs for SQL injection events.Affected if SQL injection rules are enabled but may not be properly enforced due to the vulnerability
You are affected if A10 ACOS WAF is deployed with version 2.7.1, 2.7.2, 4.1.0, 4.1.1, or 4.1.2 and SQL injection protection rules are configured, as the logic error may allow SQL injection requests to bypass the WAF.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade A10 ACOS to the patched versions: 2.7.2-P12, 4.1.0-P11, 4.1.1-P8, or 4.1.2-P4 (or later) to restore proper SQL injection rule enforcement.
Upgrade to the corresponding patched release: 2.7.2-P12 or later for 2.7.x versions; 4.1.0-P11 or later for 4.1.0; 4.1.1-P8 or later for 4.1.1; 4.1.2-P4 or later for 4.1.2
- 1. Identify the currently installed version of A10 ACOS WAF by checking the system management interface or running the appropriate version command
- 2. Based on your current version, determine the minimum patched release to upgrade to: if running 2.7.1 or 2.7.x, upgrade to 2.7.2-P12 or later; if running 4.1.0, upgrade to 4.1.0-P11 or later; if running 4.1.1, upgrade to 4.1.1-P8 or later; if running 4.1.2, upgrade to 4.1.2-P4 or later
- 3. Obtain the appropriate patch file from A10 Networks official support portal (www.a10networks.com) using your support contract credentials
- 4. Follow A10 Networks standard upgrade procedures to apply the patch, which typically involves uploading the patch through the WebUI or CLI
- 5. After upgrade completion, verify the WAF version reflects the patched release
- 6. Test that SQL injection attack rules are properly blocking SQL injection attempts to confirm the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-15904 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-15904 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data