CVE-2018-18754
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedZyXEL VMG3312-B10B 1.00(AAPP.7) devices have a backdoor root account with the tTn3+Z@!Sr0O+ password hash in the etc/default.cfg file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceZyXEL VMG3312-B10B routers (firmware 1.00(AAPP.7)) contain a hardcoded root account backdoor in the etc/default.cfg file. The account uses the password hash 'tTn3+Z@!Sr0O+', allowing remote attackers to gain full administrative privileges without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.00\(aapp.7\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the router modelAccess the router web interface or check the device label to confirm the exact model is VMG3312-B10BAffected if Device is a ZyXEL VMG3312-B10B router
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the router admin panel and navigate to Status or Maintenance > Firmware version, or use the router's CGI endpoint to retrieve version informationAffected if Firmware version is 1.00(AAPP.7)
-
Inspect the configuration file for the backdoor accountAccess the router via FTP, SSH, or Telnet (if enabled) and examine the /etc/default.cfg file for a user entry with username 'root' and password hash 'tTn3+Z@!Sr0O+'Affected if The file etc/default.cfg contains a hardcoded root account with password hash tTn3+Z@!Sr0O+
-
Verify remote management access is enabledCheck the router's web interface under Network Settings or Administration for Remote Management, TR-069, or WAN access settingsAffected if Remote management or WAN access is enabled on the device
A user is affected if they have a ZyXEL VMG3312-B10B router running firmware 1.00(AAPP.7) with the hardcoded root backdoor present in etc/default.cfg and remote management access enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware patch when available, or restrict management interface access to trusted networks until patch is released. If device is end-of-life, replace with a supported model.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-18754 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-18754 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data