CVE-2018-1992
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe IBM Power 9 OP910, OP920, and FW910 boot firmware's bootloader is responsible for loading and validating the initial boot firmware image that drives the rest of the system's hardware initialization. The bootloader firmware contains a buffer overflow vulnerability such that, if an attacker were able to replace the initial boot firmware image with a very carefully crafted and sufficiently large, malicious replacement, it could cause the bootloader, during the load of that image, to overwrite its own instruction memory and circumvent secure boot protections, install trojans, etc. IBM X-Force ID: 154345.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe IBM Power 9 OP910, OP920, and FW910 boot firmware contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in its bootloader. When the bootloader loads a maliciously crafted initial boot firmware image, it can overflow and overwrite its own instruction memory, bypassing secure boot protections and allowing trojan installation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< fw910.10< fw910.10< fw910.10< fw910.10< fw910.10< fw910.10< op910.30< op920.10CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the IBM Power System modelLocate the machine type and model number on the system hardware label, or query the BMC/Host for the system identifier (e.g., 9009-22A, 8335-GTG)Affected if The model matches one of: 9009-22A, 9223-22H, 9009-41A, 9009-42A, 9223-42H, 9008-22L, 8335-GTG, or 8335-GTH
-
Retrieve the current firmware versionUse the IBM Advanced System Management Interface (ASMI) or run 'lsprop -s /proc/device-tree/model' and 'lsprop -s /proc/device-tree/ibm,firmware-version' from the host OS, or query via IPMI/RedfishAffected if A firmware version is returned that is lower than the patched releases
-
Compare firmware version against affected ranges for AC922 (8335-GTG)If model is 8335-GTG, compare installed version to op910.30Affected if Installed version is earlier than op910.30 or contains a version number less than 30 in the op910 line
-
Compare firmware version against affected ranges for AC922 (8335-GTH)If model is 8335-GTH, compare installed version to op920.10Affected if Installed version is earlier than op920.10 or contains a version number less than 10 in the op920 line
-
Compare firmware version against affected ranges for other Power 9 modelsFor models 9009-22A, 9223-22H, 9009-41A, 9009-42A, 9223-42H, 9008-22L, compare to fw910.10Affected if Installed version is earlier than fw910.10 or contains a version number less than 10 in the fw910 line
You are affected if your IBM Power 9 system model is in the list AND its firmware version is below fw910.10 (for 9009/9223/9008 models), below op910.30 (for 8335-GTG), or below op920.10 (for 8335-GTH).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM firmware patches when available and ensure physical security controls are in place to prevent unauthorized firmware modification. Verify secure boot configuration is properly enabled after patching.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,160.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-1992 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-1992 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data