Ubuntu LinuxOperating system · Canonical

CVE-2018-20020

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-12-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.9.12 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
LibVNC before commit 7b1ef0ffc4815cab9a96c7278394152bdc89dc4d contains heap out-of-bound write vulnerability inside structure in VNC client code that can result remote code execution

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

LibVNC contains a heap out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the VNC client code (before commit 7b1ef0ffc4815cab9a96c7278394152bdc89dc4d). The flaw exists within a structure in the client implementation and can allow remote code execution via specially crafted VNC server responses.

MitigationUpdate LibVNC to the patched version (commit 7b1ef0ffc4815cab9a96c7278394152bdc89dc4d or later) to remediate the heap overflow vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ubuntu LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 14.04= 16.04= 18.04= 18.10
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 8.0= 9.0
LibvncserverApplication
Affected:< 0.9.12

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Libvncserver package
    Run 'dpkg -l | grep libvnc' on Debian/Ubuntu, or 'rpm -qa | grep vnc' on RHEL-based systems, or check for libvncclient.so files with 'find /usr -name "*libvnc*" 2>/dev/null'
    Affected if Libvncserver or libvncclient is installed with version below 0.9.12
  2. Check LibVNC client library version
    If library files exist, run 'strings libvncclient.so | grep -i version' or check the soname with 'readelf -d libvncclient.so | grep SONAME' and compare against 0.9.12
    Affected if The library version is less than 0.9.12 or cannot be determined to be 0.9.12 or later
  3. Identify applications using VNC client code
    Search for binaries that link against libvncclient: 'ldd /path/to/binary | grep vnc' or check running processes that may function as VNC viewers
    Affected if Any VNC client application is running against the vulnerable library
  4. Verify git commit of LibVNC source (if compiled from source)
    If using source-built LibVNC, check git log for the commit hash: 'git log --oneline -1' in the source directory and compare to 7b1ef0ffc4815cab9a96c7278394152bdc89dc4d
    Affected if The source commit precedes 7b1ef0ffc4815cab9a96c7278394152bdc89dc4d

The environment is affected if Libvncserver/client version is below 0.9.12 (or source commit is before 7b1ef0ffc4815cab9a96c7278394152bdc89dc4d) and any VNC client functionality is in use.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.9.12 or later
Fixed in 0.9.12
Interim mitigation

Update LibVNC to the patched version (commit 7b1ef0ffc4815cab9a96c7278394152bdc89dc4d or later) to remediate the heap overflow vulnerability.

Recommended fix High confidence

LibVNCServer 0.9.12 or later

  1. Update the package list: sudo apt-get update
  2. Upgrade libvncserver to the latest version: sudo apt-get install --upgrade libvncserver1 (or libvncclient)
  3. Verify the installed version is 0.9.12 or later: dpkg -l | grep libvncserver
  4. Restart any VNC services using the library after upgrade
Caveat Minor - the upgrade addresses a security vulnerability with no expected breaking changes to functionality

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Ubuntu Linux Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,440
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,504.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-20020 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-20020 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data