CVE-2018-4133
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in certain Apple products. Safari before 11.1 is affected. The issue involves the "WebKit" component. A Safari cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in WebKit allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted URL. The vulnerability affects Safari versions prior to 11.1, enabling attackers to potentially execute malicious client-side code in the context of a user's browsing session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11.1= 16.04= 17.10< 2.20.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Safari version on macOS or iOSOn macOS, open Safari and go to Safari > About Safari. On iOS, go to Settings > Safari > About. Note the version number displayed.Affected if The version shown is earlier than 11.1 (for example, 11.0.x or any 10.x version)
-
Check WebKit version in SafariIn Safari, enable the Develop menu (Preferences > Advanced > Show Develop menu), then select Develop > WebKit Version. Alternatively, visit about:webkit in the browser address bar.Affected if The WebKit version number is lower than the version bundled with Safari 11.1 (typically earlier than WebKit 605.1.x)
-
Identify Ubuntu Linux versionRun the command: cat /etc/lsb-release or hostnamectl. Look for the DISTRIB_RELEASE or VERSION_ID field.Affected if The version reported is 16.04 or 17.10 exactly
-
Check WebKitgtk version on UbuntuRun: dpkg -l | grep webkit or apt list --installed | grep webkit. Record the version number shown.Affected if The installed webkitgtk version is lower than 2.20.4 (for example, 2.20.3 or earlier)
-
Verify WebKitgtk library file versionCheck the shared library directly: ls -la /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwebkit2* or find /usr -name "libwebkit*" -type f 2>/dev/null. Use dpkg -S on the library file to get its version.Affected if The library version returned by dpkg -s or dpkg -S is less than 2.20.4
You are affected if Safari is earlier than version 11.1, or if running Ubuntu 16.04/17.10 with webkitgtk installed at a version lower than 2.20.4.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.20.411.1
Upgrade Safari to version 11.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Organizations should deploy the update via their device management or patch management infrastructure.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-4133 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-4133 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data