CVE-2018-4848
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE X-200 switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions < V5.2.3), SCALANCE X-200IRT switch family (incl. SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions < V5.4.1), SCALANCE X-200RNA switch family (All versions < V3.2.7), SCALANCE X-300 switch family (incl. X408 and SIPLUS NET variants) (All versions < V4.1.3). The integrated configuration web server of the affected devices could allow Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks if unsuspecting users are tricked into accessing a malicious link. User interaction is required for a successful exploitation. The user must be logged into the web interface in order for the exploitation to succeed. At the stage of publishing this security advisory no public exploitation is known. The vendor has confirmed the vulnerability and provides mitigations to resolve it.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceCross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the integrated configuration web server of Siemens SCALANCE X-200, X-200IRT, X-200RNA, and X-300 switch families. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript via a crafted URL that gets executed in the context of a logged-in user's browser session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versions< 5.4.1< 5.2.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SCALANCE device modelAccess the web interface login page or check the device label/console output to confirm the exact model (X-200, X-200IRT, X-200RNA, or X-300)Affected if The model is one of the four affected families listed in the CVE
-
Determine the installed firmware versionLog into the web configuration interface and navigate to the firmware or system information page (typically under System > Info or Device Information). The firmware version is displayed there.Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or is visible but the model is affected
-
Compare firmware version against affected rangesCross-reference the identified firmware version with these ranges: X-200 < 5.2.3 is affected, X-200IRT < 5.4.1 is affected, X-300 all versions are affected, X-200RNA check V3.2.7 as referenceAffected if For X-200: version is below 5.2.3; for X-200IRT: version is below 5.4.1; for X-300: any version; for X-200RNA: version is below 3.2.7 (reference)
-
Verify web server is enabledConfirm the integrated configuration web server is accessible and active on the device (default on ports 80/443). This is required for the XSS to be exploitable.Affected if The web server interface is accessible and the device is on the network with web management enabled
The device is affected if it is a SCALANCE X-200 (firmware < 5.2.3), X-200IRT (firmware < 5.4.1), X-200RNA (firmware < 3.2.7), or X-300 (any version) and the web management interface is enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data5.2.35.4.1
Update affected devices to firmware versions V5.2.3 or higher (X-200), V5.4.1 or higher (X-200IRT), V3.2.7 or higher (X-200RNA), or V4.1.3 or higher (X-300). Users should avoid clicking untrusted links while authenticated to the web interface.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-4848 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-4848 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data