Big Ip Application Security ManagerApplication · F5

CVE-2018-5541

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-07-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 13.1.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
When F5 BIG-IP ASM 13.0.0-13.1.0.1, 12.1.0-12.1.3.5, 11.6.0-11.6.3.1, or 11.5.1-11.5.6 is processing HTTP requests, an unusually large number of parameters can cause excessive CPU usage in the BIG-IP ASM bd process.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

F5 BIG-IP ASM versions 11.5.1-11.6.3.1 and 12.1.0-13.1.0.1 contain a denial-of-service vulnerability in the ASM bd (buffer director) process. When the ASM module processes HTTP requests containing an unusually large number of parameters, it causes excessive CPU consumption in the bd process, potentially leading to service degradation or unavailability.

MitigationApply the appropriate F5 hotfix or upgrade to a fixed version as specified in F5 K23532467. As a temporary workaround, consider implementing rate limiting or request size restrictions on the ASM policy to limit the number of parameters accepted per request.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Big Ip Application Security ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 11.5.1, <= 11.5.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.3>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.3>= 13.0.0, <= 13.1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed BIG-IP ASM version
    Run 'tmsh show sys module' or check the BIG-IP version via the web UI (System > Software Management > Image List) or command line: 'tmsh show sys version'
    Affected if The version falls within 11.5.1-11.6.3.1 or 12.1.0-13.1.0.1 (specifically 11.5.1-11.5.5, 11.6.1-11.6.3, 12.1.0-12.1.3, or 13.0.0-13.1.0)
  2. Verify ASM module is provisioned
    Run 'tmsh show sys provision' or check via the web UI (System > Provisioning) to confirm ASM module status
    Affected if ASM is provisioned and running (the vulnerability only affects systems with ASM enabled)
  3. Monitor bd process CPU consumption
    Run 'top -b -n 1 | grep bd' or use 'tmsh show sys process' to identify the bd process and observe CPU usage
    Affected if The bd process shows unusually high or sustained CPU consumption, especially when processing HTTP traffic
  4. Review ASM policy parameter limits
    Access ASM policy via web UI (Security > Application Security > Parameters) or run 'tmsh list asm policy' to inspect configured parameter limits
    Affected if No parameter count limits are configured in the ASM policy, allowing unlimited parameters per request
  5. Inspect HTTP traffic for parameter-heavy requests
    Analyze logs via 'tmsh show ltm log' or capture traffic with tcpdump to identify requests with abnormally high parameter counts
    Affected if Incoming HTTP requests contain unusually large numbers of parameters (dozens to hundreds)

You are affected if your BIG-IP runs a vulnerable ASM version (11.5.1-13.1.0.1) with ASM provisioned, and you observe high bd process CPU or accept requests with excessive parameters.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 13.1.0
Interim mitigation

Apply the appropriate F5 hotfix or upgrade to a fixed version as specified in F5 K23532467. As a temporary workaround, consider implementing rate limiting or request size restrictions on the ASM policy to limit the number of parameters accepted per request.

Fix this in Big Ip Application Security Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-5541 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-5541 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data