3cxApplication

CVE-2018-7654

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.0 Published 2018-03-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
On 3CX 15.5.6354.2 devices, the parameter "file" in the request "/api/RecordingList/download?file=" allows full access to files on the server via path traversal.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

3CX version 15.5.6354.2 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the /api/RecordingList/download endpoint. The 'file' parameter lacks proper input validation, allowing attackers to use directory traversal sequences (e.g., ../../) to read arbitrary files on the server file system.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched 3CX version if available. If no patch exists, implement strict input validation on the file parameter to reject traversal characters, or deploy a WAF rule to block directory traversal patterns in requests to this endpoint.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
3cxApplication
Affected:= 15.5.6354.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify 3CX installation exists
    Check if 3CX software is installed on the system. On Windows, open Control Panel > Programs and Features and look for '3CX' in the installed programs list, or check the default installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\3CX\).
    Affected if 3CX is not installed on the system.
  2. Confirm installed 3CX version
    In the 3CX Management Console, navigate to Dashboard to view the version number, or check the Windows installed programs list. Compare the version to 15.5.6354.2.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 15.5.6354.2.
  3. Verify web server is running
    Check if the 3CX web server is active. Typically, the management console listens on port 5000 or 443. Use a browser or curl to access the base URL (e.g., https://your-server:5000 or https://your-server).
    Affected if The 3CX web interface is accessible.
  4. Test for vulnerable endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access the /api/RecordingList/download endpoint by sending a request to your 3CX server (e.g., curl https://your-server:5000/api/RecordingList/download). Check if the endpoint responds (even with an error).
    Affected if The endpoint responds with any HTTP response (200, 400, 401, etc.), indicating the API is exposed.
  5. Check if file parameter accepts traversal
    If the endpoint is accessible, test the vulnerability by sending a request with a directory traversal pattern in the file parameter (e.g., /api/RecordingList/download?file=../../../../windows/win.ini).
    Affected if The server accepts the request and returns content from outside the intended directory, confirming the path traversal vulnerability.

You are affected if 3CX version 15.5.6354.2 is installed, the web server is running, and the /api/RecordingList/download endpoint accepts directory traversal sequences in the file parameter.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to a patched 3CX version if available. If no patch exists, implement strict input validation on the file parameter to reject traversal characters, or deploy a WAF rule to block directory traversal patterns in requests to this endpoint.

Fix this in 3cx Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,790
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,464.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-7654 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-7654 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data