CVE-2018-7825
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Command Injection vulnerability exists in the web-based GUI of the 1st Gen PelcoSarix Enhanced Camera that could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in the web-based GUI of the 1st Gen PelcoSarix Enhanced Camera that allows remote attackers to inject and execute arbitrary operating system commands through unsanitized input fields in the web interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.11>= 2.11>= 2.11>= 2.11< 2.2.3.0< 2.2.3.0< 2.2.3.0< 2.2.3.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the camera modelLog into the web interface and check the system information page, or use network enumeration to identify the device model (D6220, D6220l, D6230, D6230l, Imes19 series, or Ime119 1i)Affected if The device is one of the PelcoSarix Enhanced models listed in the affected products
-
Check the firmware versionIn the web GUI, navigate to Settings > System > Information (or equivalent) to view the installed firmware versionAffected if The firmware version matches the affected ranges: D6220/D6220l/D6230/D6230l >= 2.11, or Imes19/Ime119 < 2.2.3.0
-
Confirm web GUI is enabledAttempt to access the web interface HTTP/HTTPS port (typically 80 or 443) on the device IP addressAffected if The web-based GUI is accessible over the network (the vulnerability can only be exploited through the web interface)
-
Verify network exposureCheck if the device web interface is reachable from untrusted networks by reviewing firewall rules or network segmentationAffected if The web GUI is exposed to broader network segments beyond trusted administration networks
The device is affected if it is a PelcoSarix Enhanced camera model (D6220, D6220l, D6230, D6230l, or Imes19/Ime119) with firmware matching the specified version ranges AND the web interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data2.2.3.0
Restrict network access to camera management interfaces via firewall rules or network segmentation; apply vendor firmware updates if available; disable the web GUI if not required.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2018-7825 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2018-7825 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data