CVE-2019-0189
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe java.io.ObjectInputStream is known to cause Java serialisation issues. This issue here is exposed by the "webtools/control/httpService" URL, and uses Java deserialization to perform code execution. In the HttpEngine, the value of the request parameter "serviceContext" is passed to the "deserialize" method of "XmlSerializer". Apache Ofbiz is affected via two different dependencies: "commons-beanutils" and an out-dated version of "commons-fileupload" Mitigation: Upgrade to 16.11.06 or manually apply the commits from OFBIZ-10770 and OFBIZ-10837 on branch 16
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache OFBiz contains a critical Java deserialization vulnerability exposed via the 'webtools/control/httpService' URL. The 'serviceContext' request parameter is passed unsafely to XmlSerializer's deserialize method, allowing remote code execution. The vulnerability stems from two vulnerable dependencies: commons-beanutils and an outdated commons-fileupload library.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 16.11.01, < 16.11.06CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache OFBiz installationLocate the OFBiz installation directory and look for the version manifest. Typically found in 'framework/ofbiz/manifest' or check the build file (build.gradle or pom.xml) for the version property.Affected if OFBiz is present and the version is 16.11.01 through 16.11.05 inclusive.
-
Confirm installed OFBiz versionCheck the version file or build configuration in the OFBiz root directory. Look for a version file or execute: grep -r 'version' build.gradle 2>/dev/null | head -5Affected if The reported version falls within >= 16.11.01 and < 16.11.06.
-
Determine if webtools component is activeInspect the 'framework/webtools' directory exists within the OFBiz installation. The vulnerable endpoint '/webtools/control/httpService' is part of this component.Affected if The webtools component is present and the application is running.
-
Verify vulnerable dependencies are in useInspect the 'runtime/lib' or 'framework/ofbiz/lib' directories for commons-beanutils.jar. Also check the build configuration for commons-fileupload version.Affected if commons-beanutils is present and commons-fileupload version is older than 1.3.3 or unspecified in the affected version range.
-
Confirm network exposure of vulnerable endpointCheck if the OFBiz server is accessible on port 8443 (SSL) or 8080 (HTTP). The endpoint webtools/control/httpService may be reachable without authentication.Affected if The webtools interface is exposed on a network-accessible port without proper access controls.
You are affected if Apache OFBiz version 16.11.01 through 16.11.05 is running with the webtools component accessible and vulnerable dependencies present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped16.11.06
Upgrade to Apache OFBiz version 16.11.06 or later, which addresses the vulnerable dependencies. Alternatively, manually apply commits OFBIZ-10770 and OFBIZ-10837 to branch 16 to patch the deserialization issue.
16.11.06
- Backup the current Apache OFBiz installation and all custom configurations, scripts, and data
- Stop the currently running OFBiz instance
- Download Apache OFBiz version 16.11.06 from the official Apache repository (https://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html)
- Extract the new 16.11.06 version to the target installation directory
- Migrate any custom configurations, plugins, or data from the backup to the new installation
- Start the OFBiz 16.11.06 instance
- Verify the webtools/control/httpService endpoint is no longer vulnerable by confirming the deserialization vulnerability is patched
- Test critical business workflows to ensure the upgrade did not break existing functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-0189 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-0189 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data