CVE-2019-0192
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Apache Solr versions 5.0.0 to 5.5.5 and 6.0.0 to 6.6.5, the Config API allows to configure the JMX server via an HTTP POST request. By pointing it to a malicious RMI server, an attacker could take advantage of Solr's unsafe deserialization to trigger remote code execution on the Solr side.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Solr Config API in versions 5.0.0-5.5.5 and 6.0.0-6.6.5 allows configuring the JMX server via HTTP POST. An attacker can point this to a malicious RMI server to exploit unsafe deserialization, achieving remote code execution on the Solr instance.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.0.0, <= 5.5.5>= 6.0.0, <= 6.6.5all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Solr versionRun: bin/solr version or check the solr-$VERSION.jar file in the installation directory, or query the Solr API at /solr/admin/info/systemAffected if The version is 5.0.0-5.5.5 or 6.0.0-6.6.5, indicating the instance has the vulnerable Config API
-
Verify if Config API accepts JMX configurationSend a POST request to /solr/<collection>/config with a body containing JMX-related settings such as {"set-property":{"jmx":{"serviceUrl":"service:jmx:rmi://localhost:18983"}}}. Inspect the response for success or error messages indicating whether JMX configuration is allowed.Affected if The Config API accepts and applies JMX configuration changes, enabling an attacker to redirect the JMX service URL
-
Check if JMX port is exposed or accessibleRun netstat -an | grep 18983 or ss -tlnp | grep 18983 to see if the default JMX port (18983) is listening. Also check if the Solr process has JMX beans enabled by examining JMX-related logs or MBeans.Affected if The JMX port 18983 is open and reachable, or JMX is enabled in the Solr configuration, allowing deserialization attacks via RMI
-
Assess network exposure of Solr servicesReview firewall rules and network segmentation around the Solr host. Determine if the Solr HTTP API (port 8983 by default) and JMX port are accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.Affected if Solr HTTP or JMX ports are accessible from untrusted network segments, increasing exploitability
You are affected if you run Apache Solr versions 5.0.0-5.5.5 or 6.0.0-6.6.5 (or any Netapp Storage Automation Store version) and the Config API accepts JMX configuration or JMX ports are network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache Solr 5.5.6 or 6.6.6 and later, which contain the fix for this vulnerability. Alternatively, disable or restrict JMX/remote RMI access and network-segment the Solr service.
Solr 5.6.0+ for 5.x branch, or Solr 6.7.0+/7.x for 6.x branch
- 1. Backup your current Solr configuration and data directories before any upgrade
- 2. Identify your current Solr version by checking the version.txt file in the Solr home directory or running: bin/solr version
- 3. If running Solr 5.x (5.0.0 to 5.5.5), upgrade to Solr 5.6.0 or later
- 4. If running Solr 6.x (6.0.0 to 6.6.5), upgrade to Solr 6.7.0 or later (preferably 7.x)
- 5. After upgrade, verify the Config API no longer allows unauthenticated JMX server configuration
- 6. If upgrading is not immediately possible, disable the Config API or restrict access to it via network segmentation and authentication
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-0192 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-0192 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data