CVE-2019-0212
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn all previously released Apache HBase 2.x versions (2.0.0-2.0.4, 2.1.0-2.1.3), authorization was incorrectly applied to users of the HBase REST server. Requests sent to the HBase REST server were executed with the permissions of the REST server itself, not with the permissions of the end-user. This issue is only relevant when HBase is configured with Kerberos authentication, HBase authorization is enabled, and the REST server is configured with SPNEGO authentication. This issue does not extend beyond the HBase REST server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe HBase REST server executes API requests with its own elevated permissions rather than authenticating the end-user through SPNEGO and applying their specific Kerberos-based authorization. This allows authenticated users to bypass authorization checks and potentially perform operations using the REST server's privileges instead of their own limited permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, <= 2.0.4>= 2.1.0, <= 2.1.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if HBase REST server is runningCheck for the HBase REST server process or its default port (typically 8080 or 8085). Use commands like 'ps aux | grep rest' or 'netstat -tlnp | grep 8080' to locate the process.Affected if The HBase REST server is running and accessible on your network.
-
Determine installed HBase versionRun 'hbase version' or check the HBase JAR file name in the installation directory. Compare the version number to the affected ranges: 2.0.0 through 2.0.4, or 2.1.0 through 2.1.3.Affected if The installed version falls within 2.0.0-2.0.4 or 2.1.0-2.1.3.
-
Check if SPNEGO authentication is configured for REST serverInspect the HBase REST server configuration (typically in hbase-site.xml or REST-specific config files) for properties related to 'spnego' or 'kerberos' authentication. Look for REST server authentication settings.Affected if SPNEGO authentication is not explicitly configured for the REST server, or the configuration allows requests to execute with service-level privileges.
-
Verify REST server is using service credentials instead of user credentialsWhen authenticated via Kerberos, make an API request to the REST server and inspect whether the operation executes with the REST service's permissions rather than the authenticated user's permissions. Check logs for the identity used during request execution.Affected if Operations execute with the REST server's elevated permissions rather than the end-user's delegated Kerberos credentials.
You are affected if the HBase REST server is running on a version between 2.0.0-2.0.4 or 2.1.0-2.1.3 and requests execute with service privileges instead of user-delegated credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade HBase to version 2.0.5, 2.1.4, or later where the REST server properly authenticates end-users via SPNEGO and enforces authorization based on the authenticated user's permissions rather than the service's permissions.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-0212 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-0212 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data