CVE-2019-0284
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSLD Registration in SAP HANA (fixed in versions 1.0, 2.0) does not sufficiently validate an XML document accepted from an untrusted source. The attacker can call SLDREG with an XML file containing a reference to an XML External Entity (XXE). This can cause SLDREG to, for example, continuously loop, read arbitrary files and even send local files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSAP HANA SLD Registration utility (SLDREG) does not sufficiently validate XML documents from untrusted sources, allowing XML External Entity (XXE) injection. An attacker can craft malicious XML files containing external entity references to cause denial of service (infinite loops), read arbitrary local files, or exfiltrate data from the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0= 2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm SAP HANA installationRun 'HDB version' or check for SAP HANA database processes using 'ps -ef | grep hdb'Affected if SAP HANA is not installed on the system
-
Identify installed SAP HANA versionExecute 'HDB version' or query the SAP HANA database: SELECT * FROM M_SYSTEM_OVERVIEW WHERE SECTION = 'General' in SQL editorAffected if The version is SAP HANA 1.0 or SAP HANA 2.0 (any subversion)
-
Verify SLDREG component presenceCheck for SLDREG binary or files in SAP HANA installation directory, typically under /usr/sap/<SID>/HDB<instance>/ or search for 'sldreg' using: find /usr/sap -name '*sldreg*' 2>/dev/nullAffected if SLDREG executable or related files exist on the system
-
Check SLDREG configuration statusExamine SAP HANA SLD configuration via SAP HANA cockpit or check configuration files in $DIR_INSTANCE/../sld/ directory for enabled statusAffected if SLDREG is configured and enabled in the SAP HANA environment
You are affected if SAP HANA versions 1.0 or 2.0 is installed and the SLDREG component is present and enabled on your system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate SAP HANA to versions 1.0 or 2.0 where the vulnerability is fixed. If immediate patching is not possible, disable SLDREG or restrict access to the SLDREG interface to prevent untrusted XML input.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-0284 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-0284 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data