Audit To DatabaseDatabase / datastore · Jenkins
CVE-2019-1003076
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Jenkins Audit to Database Plugin in the DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl#doTestJdbcConnection form validation method allows attackers to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a CSRF vulnerability in the Jenkins Audit to Database Plugin where the DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl#doTestJdbcConnection form validation method lacks CSRF protection. An authenticated Jenkins user can be tricked into initiating a JDBC connection to an attacker-controlled server, potentially exposing database credentials or enabling SSRF attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Audit To DatabaseDatabase / datastore
all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Jenkins Audit to Database plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or use the Jenkins script console with: Jenkins.instance.pluginManager.plugins.collect { it.shortName }.contains('audit-to-database')Affected if The plugin is listed as installed - if present, all versions are affected since the entire version range is vulnerable
-
Verify the plugin provides the DbAuditPublisher form validation endpointCheck if the plugin is accessible at Manage Jenkins > Configure System > Audit to Database section, or attempt to access a configuration page that triggers the doTestJdbcConnection form validation methodAffected if The plugin configuration UI is accessible and allows form validation testing - this confirms the attack surface exists
-
Confirm Jenkins user authentication is activeVerify Jenkins has authentication enabled (Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security > Authentication section shows users or an authentication realm is configured)Affected if Jenkins has authenticated users - the CSRF attack requires an authenticated user to be tricked into making the malicious request
If the Audit to Database plugin is installed and Jenkins has user authentication enabled, the environment is vulnerable to CSRF-induced JDBC connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply Jenkins CSRF protection (crumb validation) to the doTestJdbcConnection form validation endpoint in the plugin, typically by adding @ crumb annotation or implementing CrumbIssuer validation.
Fix this in Audit To Database
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1003076 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1003076 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data