CVE-2019-1003077
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA missing permission check in Jenkins Audit to Database Plugin in the DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl#doTestJdbcConnection form validation method allows attackers with Overall/Read permission to initiate a connection to an attacker-specified server.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins Audit to Database Plugin has a missing permission check in the DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl#doTestJdbcConnection form validation method. Attackers with default Overall/Read permission can abuse this to initiate JDBC connections to attacker-controlled servers, enabling Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) for network reconnaissance or data exfiltration.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Audit to Database plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or use the CLI: jenkins-cli.jar or REST API GET /pluginManager/plugin/audit-to-databaseAffected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list
-
Check plugin versionLook up the plugin version in the Installed Plugins table, or query GET /pluginManager/plugin/audit-to-database/api/jsonAffected if Any version is returned (all versions are affected)
-
Identify the vulnerable endpointCheck if the endpoint /descriptor/au.com.interlated.audit.db.DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl/doTestJdbcConnection is accessibleAffected if The endpoint responds without requiring admin-level permissions
-
Test permission requirementSubmit a test JDBC connection request as a user with only Overall/Read permission (or as anonymous), e.g., POST to /descriptor/au.com.interlated.audit.db.DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl/doTestJdbcConnection with jdbcUrl parameter pointing to a test serverAffected if The request succeeds or returns a validation response instead of a permission denied error
-
Review form validation method codeExamine the plugin's DbAuditPublisherDescriptorImpl class for the doTestJdbcConnection method - verify if @Restricted or permission annotations are presentAffected if The method lacks permission checks such as @RequirePOST with appropriate permission requirements or StaplerPermission checks
If the Audit to Database plugin is installed and the doTestJdbcConnection endpoint responds without requiring admin-level permissions, the environment is vulnerable to SSRF.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataAdd permission checks (e.g., using Jenkins' StaplerPermission check or appropriate permission requirements) to the doTestJdbcConnection method to ensure only authorized users can test database connections and cannot specify arbitrary server targets.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1003077 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1003077 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data