Netiq Self Service Password ResetApplication · Microfocus

CVE-2019-11674

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-10-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 4.3 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Man-in-the-middle vulnerability in Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset, affecting all versions prior to 4.4.0.4. The vulnerability could exploit invalid certificate validation and may result in a man-in-the-middle attack.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The vulnerability is an SSL/TLS certificate validation flaw in Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset where the product fails to properly validate server certificates. This allows an attacker positioned on the network path between the client and server to intercept communications by presenting a fraudulent certificate, potentially capturing sensitive authentication credentials during password reset operations.

MitigationUpgrade Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset to version 4.4.0.4 or later, which contains proper certificate validation logic. Until patched, avoid using the product over untrusted networks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Netiq Self Service Password ResetApplication
Affected:<= 4.3= 4.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset is installed
    Look for installation directories named 'NetIQ' or 'Self Service Password Reset' in typical locations such as C:\Program Files\NetIQ or C:\Micro Focus, or check for running services named 'Self Service Password Reset' in Windows Services or Unix init systems
    Affected if The product is found to be installed on the system
  2. Determine the installed version
    Check the product's About page, readme files in the installation directory, or query the application binaries for version information. The version format appears as 4.3.x or 4.4.x
    Affected if The version returned is 4.3 (any minor version) or exactly 4.4, meaning it falls within the <=4.3 or =4.4 affected ranges
  3. Verify if HTTPS/SSL is configured for the product
    Examine the product's configuration files (commonly found in the 'config' or 'conf' subdirectory within the installation) for web server settings, connector configurations, or URL definitions that indicate HTTPS usage. Also check if the product is accessed via HTTPS URLs in your environment
    Affected if The product is configured to accept HTTPS connections, as the certificate validation flaw only applies when SSL/TLS transport is in use
  4. Inspect SSL certificate validation configuration
    Look for configuration parameters related to SSL certificate validation in the product's configuration files or web server settings. Check for properties such as 'validateServerCertificate', 'trustAllCerts', or similar SSL validation settings that may be set to disabled or false
    Affected if Certificate validation is disabled or set to bypass trust verification, indicating the vulnerable configuration is present

You are affected if Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset version 4.3 (any subversion) or version 4.4 is installed and the product is configured to use HTTPS/SSL connections for password reset operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 4.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Micro Focus Self Service Password Reset to version 4.4.0.4 or later, which contains proper certificate validation logic. Until patched, avoid using the product over untrusted networks.

Fix this in Netiq Self Service Password Reset Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-11674 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-11674 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data