CVE-2019-12144
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in SSHServerAPI.dll in Progress ipswitch WS_FTP Server 2018 before 8.6.1. Attackers have the ability to abuse a path traversal vulnerability using the SCP protocol. Attackers who leverage this flaw could also obtain remote code execution by crafting a payload that abuses the SITE command feature.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA path traversal vulnerability exists in SSHServerAPI.dll in Progress ipswitch WS_FTP Server 2018 before version 8.6.1. The vulnerability is triggered through the SCP protocol, allowing attackers to manipulate file paths outside the intended directory. Attackers can achieve remote code execution by crafting malicious payloads that abuse the SITE command feature.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.6.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify WS_FTP Server installation and versionCheck the installed version of WS_FTP Server through Windows Programs and Features, or query the SSHServerAPI.dll file properties (right-click > Properties > Details) located in the WS_FTP Server installation directory, commonly in C:\Program Files\Ipswitch\WS_FTP Server\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Ipswitch\WS_FTP Server\Affected if The installed version is earlier than 8.6.1 (for example, 8.6.0, 8.5.x, or earlier)
-
Verify SCP protocol is enabledOpen WS_FTP Server Administrator, navigate to Server > Connections > SSH2 Settings, and locate the SCP protocol configuration under the protocol settings panelAffected if SCP protocol is enabled and allowed for user connections
-
Confirm SITE command is accessibleIn WS_FTP Server Administrator, go to Server > Commands or Site Commands settings to verify if the SITE command feature is available and not explicitly disabled for SCP connectionsAffected if SITE command feature is enabled and accessible to users connecting via SCP
-
Review SCP user access controlsIn WS_FTP Server Administrator, check the user or group permissions under Users > [selected user] > Home Directory and verify whether users with SCP access have restrictions limiting them to their designated home directoriesAffected if Users have broad file system access through SCP without directory confinement
Your environment is affected if WS_FTP Server version is earlier than 8.6.1 AND SCP protocol is enabled with SITE command access available to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.6.1
Upgrade WS_FTP Server to version 8.6.1 or later to obtain the security patch. As an interim measure, disable or restrict SCP protocol access if not required, and monitor for suspicious SITE command usage.
WS_FTP Server 2018 version 8.6.1
- 1. Back up the current WS_FTP Server configuration and data
- 2. Review the official release notes for WS_FTP Server 8.6.1 to understand changes and requirements
- 3. Verify that your current operating environment meets the requirements for version 8.6.1
- 4. Download WS_FTP Server version 8.6.1 from the official Progress (Ipswitch) download portal
- 5. Stop the WS_FTP Server service before applying the upgrade
- 6. Install version 8.6.1 following the vendor's documented upgrade procedure
- 7. After installation, verify the server is running and test SCP functionality
- 8. Review and validate that the SITE command restrictions are properly configured post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12144 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12144 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data