CVE-2023-40044
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn WS_FTP Server versions prior to 8.7.4 and 8.8.2, a pre-authenticated attacker could leverage a .NET deserialization vulnerability in the Ad Hoc Transfer module to execute remote commands on the underlying WS_FTP Server operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA pre-authenticated .NET deserialization vulnerability in the Ad Hoc Transfer module of WS_FTP Server versions prior to 8.7.4 and 8.2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the host operating system without any authentication credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.7.4>= 8.8, < 8.8.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm WS_FTP Server is installedCheck for WS_FTP Server installation directory, typically at C:\Program Files\Ipswitch\WS_FTP Server\ or look in Windows Programs and Features for 'WS_FTP Server'Affected if WS_FTP Server is not installed on the system
-
Identify installed WS_FTP Server versionOpen Windows Control Panel > Programs and Features > select WS_FTP Server > check the Version column, or run: reg query 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Ipswitch\WS_FTP Server\8.0\Setup' /v VersionAffected if Version is less than 8.7.4 OR version is 8.8.0 or 8.8.1 (falls within < 8.7.4 or >= 8.8, < 8.8.2)
-
Verify Ad Hoc Transfer module statusOpen WS_FTP Server Administration console > go to Server > Extensions > Ad Hoc Transfer, or check registry: reg query 'HKLM\SOFTWARE\Ipswitch\WS_FTP Server\Ad Hoc Transfer' /v EnabledAffected if Ad Hoc Transfer module is enabled (this is the vulnerable component)
-
Check network exposure of FTP serviceReview firewall rules and WS_FTP Server listener configuration to determine if ports used by Ad Hoc Transfer (typically HTTP/HTTPS ports) are accessible from untrusted networksAffected if Ad Hoc Transfer web interface is reachable from external/untrusted networks (pre-authentication flaw)
System is affected if WS_FTP Server versions 8.7.0-8.7.3, 8.8.0, or 8.8.1 are installed WITH the Ad Hoc Transfer module enabled and exposed to network access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.7.48.8.2
Upgrade WS_FTP Server to version 8.7.4 or 8.8.2 or later to apply the patch for the deserialization vulnerability in the Ad Hoc Transfer module.
Upgrade to WS_FTP Server 8.7.4 or later (for 8.7.x branch), or 8.8.2 or later (for 8.8.x branch)
- 1. Identify the current version of WS_FTP Server by checking the About or version information in the WS_FTP Server administration interface
- 2. If running version 8.7.x (versions prior to 8.7.4), plan to upgrade to version 8.7.4 or later
- 3. If running version 8.8.x (versions 8.8.0 or 8.8.1), plan to upgrade to version 8.8.2 or later
- 4. Before upgrading, backup the WS_FTP Server configuration and data
- 5. Download the appropriate fixed version from the official Progress Software download site or vendor portal
- 6. Apply the upgrade following the standard WS_FTP Server upgrade procedure documented in the product manual
- 7. After upgrade, verify the WS_FTP Server services are running correctly
- 8. Test that the Ad Hoc Transfer module functions properly after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-40044 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-40044 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data