CVE-2019-12698
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the WebVPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause increased CPU utilization on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to excessive processing load for a specific WebVPN HTTP page request. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending multiple WebVPN HTTP page load requests for a specific URL. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to increase CPU load on the device, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition, which could cause traffic to be delayed through the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA vulnerability in the WebVPN feature of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause excessive CPU utilization by sending multiple HTTP page requests for a specific WebVPN URL. This results in a denial of service condition, causing traffic delays through the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.6.4.31>= 9.7, < 9.8.4.9>= 9.9, < 9.9.2.56>= 9.10, < 9.10.1.30>= 9.12, < 9.12.2.9>= 9.13, < 9.13.1< 6.2.3.15>= 6.3.0, < 6.3.0.5>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.0.6CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Cisco ASA software versionRun the command to display the ASA software version (for example, `show version` or check the system startup banner). Compare the version number to the affected ranges: < 9.6.4.31; >= 9.7 and < 9.8.4.9; >= 9.9 and < 9.9.2.56; >= 9.10 and < 9.10.1.30; >= 9.12 and < 9.12.2.9; >= 9.13 and < 9.13.1Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected version ranges listed.
-
Identify the installed Cisco FTD software versionRun the command to display the FTD software version (for example, `show version` or check the system management interface). Compare the version number to the affected ranges: < 6.2.3.15; >= 6.3.0 and < 6.3.0.5; >= 6.4.0 and < 6.4.0.6Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected version ranges listed.
-
Determine if WebVPN is enabled on the ASACheck the ASA configuration for active WebVPN settings (for example, run `show run webvpn` or inspect the configuration file for webvpn-related commands). Look for any enabled WebVPN configurations such as `webvpn` or `enable` inside the webvpn context.Affected if WebVPN is actively configured and enabled on the device.
-
Verify WebVPN is enabled on the FTDCheck the FTD configuration through the management interface or CLI for WebVPN profiles or AnyConnect configurations that indicate WebVPN is active.Affected if WebVPN is actively configured and enabled on the device.
The system is affected if it runs a vulnerable ASA or FTD version AND has WebVPN enabled, because the DoS condition only impacts devices with WebVPN active.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.2.3.156.3.0.56.4.0.6
Apply the relevant Cisco security updates for ASA and FTD software. If patches are unavailable, consider disabling WebVPN if not required, or implement upstream rate limiting to reduce the impact of repeated requests.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-12698 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-12698 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data