RancherApplication · Suse

CVE-2019-13209

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.0 Published 2019-09-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 2.2.4 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Rancher 2 through 2.2.4 is vulnerable to a Cross-Site Websocket Hijacking attack that allows an exploiter to gain access to clusters managed by Rancher. The attack requires a victim to be logged into a Rancher server, and then to access a third-party site hosted by the exploiter. Once that is accomplished, the exploiter is able to execute commands against the cluster's Kubernetes API with the permissions and identity of the victim.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Rancher 2.0 through 2.2.4 lacks proper origin validation on WebSocket connections, allowing Cross-Site Websocket Hijacking (CSWSH). An attacker hosting a malicious page can trick an authenticated Rancher user into visiting that page, then hijack the user's WebSocket connection to execute commands against the managed Kubernetes cluster with the victim's permissions.

MitigationUpgrade Rancher to version 2.2.5 or later which includes proper WebSocket origin validation. Until then, advise users to avoid accessing untrusted websites while logged into Rancher.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RancherApplication
Affected:>= 2.0.0, <= 2.2.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Rancher version via UI
    Log into the Rancher web interface, navigate to the settings or 'About' page (often found under the user menu or global settings), and locate the Rancher version displayed there.
    Affected if The displayed version is between 2.0.0 and 2.2.4 inclusive.
  2. Check Rancher version via API
    Make an authenticated API request to the Rancher server endpoint '/v1' or '/ping' and inspect the version field in the JSON response.
    Affected if The version field in the API response indicates a version between 2.0.0 and 2.2.4 inclusive.
  3. Check Rancher version from container or pod
    If Rancher is running in Docker or Kubernetes, inspect the running container or pod: for Docker, run 'docker ps' and then 'docker inspect <container_id>' to find the image tag; for Kubernetes, run 'kubectl get pods -n cattle-system' and check the image associated with the rancher pod.
    Affected if The container image tag or version corresponds to a release between 2.0.0 and 2.2.4 inclusive.
  4. Check Rancher version via Helm
    If Rancher was installed via Helm, run 'helm list -n cattle-system' to list the Helm release and its version, or check the values.yaml for the Rancher version tag.
    Affected if The Helm release version or image tag is between 2.0.0 and 2.2.4 inclusive.

If the installed Rancher version falls within the range of 2.0.0 through 2.2.4, the environment is affected by this Cross-Site WebSocket Hijacking vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 2.2.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Rancher to version 2.2.5 or later which includes proper WebSocket origin validation. Until then, advise users to avoid accessing untrusted websites while logged into Rancher.

Fix this in Rancher Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,472.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-13209 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-13209 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data