CVE-2019-14193
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Das U-Boot through 2019.07. There is an unbounded memcpy with an unvalidated length at nfs_readlink_reply, in the "if" block after calculating the new path length.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceU-Boot contains an unbounded memcpy vulnerability in the nfs_readlink_reply function where a calculated path length is used without validation, allowing a buffer overflow. This occurs in the NFS client code when processing NFS readlink replies.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2019.07CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed U-Boot versionCheck the U-Boot version string in the bootloader binary, boot logs, or version header file (version.h). Common commands: 'strings u-boot.bin | grep U-Boot' or check the boot console output.Affected if The version is 2019.07 or any earlier version (e.g., 2019.04, 2018.x, etc.)
-
Verify if NFS client support is enabledInspect the U-Boot configuration file (.config or defconfig) for CONFIG_CMD_NFS or CONFIG_NFS. For built binaries, use 'grep NFS' on the image or check the configuration used during build.Affected if CONFIG_CMD_NFS or CONFIG_NFS is set to y/yes, enabling NFS client functionality
-
Confirm NFS client is compiled into the binaryCheck the U-Boot binary for NFS-related symbols or strings: 'strings u-boot.bin | grep -i nfs' or use binwalk/fwalk to identify NFS code presence.Affected if NFS client code is present in the compiled U-Boot image
-
Determine if the system uses NFS boot or mounts NFS volumesReview the boot scripts (boot.scr, boot.env), kernel command line, or filesystem mount configurations to identify any NFS usage.Affected if NFS is configured as a boot source or mounted filesystem in the environment
You are affected if your U-Boot version is 2019.07 or earlier AND the NFS client feature (CONFIG_NFS) is enabled in your build configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate U-Boot to a version after 2019.07 which includes bounds checking on the path length before the memcpy operation in nfs_readlink_reply. If patching is not possible, disable NFS client support in U-Boot configurations.
U-Boot 2019.10 or later (any stable release after 2019.07)
- 1. Identify all U-Boot deployments in your environment that are running version 2019.07 or earlier
- 2. Obtain the latest stable U-Boot release from the official source (https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot) or your board vendor
- 3. Build the new U-Boot version for your specific hardware platform using the standard build process (make <board_defconfig> && make)
- 4. Replace the vulnerable U-Boot binary/image on affected devices or in your build system
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the version string at boot (or via fw_printenv/version)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14193 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14193 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data