CVE-2019-14194
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Das U-Boot through 2019.07. There is an unbounded memcpy with a failed length check at nfs_read_reply when calling store_block in the NFSv2 case.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Das U-Boot's NFS client implementation where the nfs_read_reply function performs an unbounded memcpy without proper length validation when calling store_block in NFSv2 read responses. This allows remote attackers to overwrite memory by sending maliciously crafted NFS packets, potentially achieving arbitrary code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2019.07CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify U-Boot versionRun 'version' or 'ver' command in U-Boot shell, or inspect the U-Boot binary/bootlog for version stringAffected if Version string shows 2019.07 or earlier (e.g., 2019.07, 2019.04, 2018.x, etc.)
-
Verify NFS client support is enabledCheck U-Boot configuration file (.config) for 'CONFIG_CMD_NFS' or 'CONFIG_NFS' setting, or run 'printenv' and look for NFS-related environment variables like 'nfsroot'Affected if CONFIG_CMD_NFS or CONFIG_NFS is set to 'y' in the build config, or NFS boot variables are defined in the environment
-
Confirm NFS client is compiled into the binaryRun 'help' in U-Boot shell and check if 'nfs' command is listed, or use 'grep -i nfs u-boot.bin' on the binary imageAffected if The 'nfs' command is available in U-Boot or NFS-related strings are present in the binary
-
Assess NFS exposureReview network configuration and boot scripts to determine if U-Boot is configured to mount from untrusted NFS serversAffected if U-Boot is configured to boot from or access NFS shares from network locations that are not trusted or are publicly accessible
You are affected if your U-Boot version is 2019.07 or earlier AND the NFS client feature (CONFIG_CMD_NFS) is enabled in your build configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Das U-Boot to a version beyond 2019.07 that contains the patch for this vulnerability. If immediate updating is not feasible, disable NFS client support in the U-Boot configuration and ensure U-Boot is not exposed to untrusted NFS servers.
U-Boot 2019.10 or later stable release (the fix was committed shortly after the 2019.07 release)
- 1. Identify all embedded devices or systems running U-Boot version 2019.07 or earlier that use NFS client functionality
- 2. Obtain the latest stable U-Boot release from the official U-Boot repository (https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot)
- 3. Rebuild U-Boot from source using the latest stable release that includes the fix for CVE-2019-14194
- 4. Verify the fix is present in the NFS code by checking that nfs_read_reply now includes proper bounds checking before calling store_block
- 5. Flash the updated U-Boot binary to affected devices
- 6. Test NFS client functionality to confirm the fix does not break legitimate NFS operations
- 7. If unable to upgrade immediately, disable NFS client support in U-Boot configuration (CONFIG_CMD_NFS) as a temporary mitigation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14194 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14194 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data