CVE-2019-14196
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue was discovered in Das U-Boot through 2019.07. There is an unbounded memcpy with a failed length check at nfs_lookup_reply.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Das U-Boot's NFS client implementation where the nfs_lookup_reply handler performs an unbounded memcpy() without proper length validation. The failed length check allows an attacker controlling a malicious NFS server to overflow the heap or stack buffer, potentially achieving remote code execution on the affected device during the network boot process.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2019.07CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Das U-Boot is the bootloaderExamine the device or system boot logs, console output, or firmware to confirm Das U-Boot is running as the bootloader. Look for the U-Boot prompt or version string during boot.Affected if Das U-Boot is confirmed as the bootloader and the version cannot be determined or is <= 2019.07
-
Determine the installed U-Boot versionAccess the U-Boot console or boot logs and run the 'version' or 'printenv' command to retrieve the U-Boot version number. Compare this version against the affected range.Affected if The U-Boot version is <= 2019.07 or cannot be determined
-
Check if NFS client support is enabledInspect the U-Boot configuration (CONFIG_CMD_NFS or similar NFS-related config options in the build configuration or defconfig file) to see if NFS client functionality was compiled into the image.Affected if NFS client support is enabled in the U-Boot build configuration
-
Verify if NFS boot is configuredExamine U-Boot environment variables (via 'printenv' in the U-Boot console) for NFS-related boot variables such as 'netboot', 'nfsroot', 'bootfile' or boot commands that invoke NFS mount operations.Affected if NFS boot variables or NFS mount commands are present in the U-Boot environment
-
Determine exposure of network boot interfacesReview network configuration and firewall rules to assess whether the device network boot interfaces (used for PXE or NFS boot) are accessible from untrusted networks or the internet.Affected if Network boot interfaces are exposed to untrusted or public networks
The environment is affected if Das U-Boot version is <= 2019.07 AND NFS client support is enabled AND NFS boot is configured or the device uses network boot with potential exposure to malicious NFS servers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Das U-Boot to a version after 2019.07 that contains the fix for proper bounds checking. If updating is not feasible, disable NFS boot functionality and ensure network boot interfaces are not exposed to untrusted networks.
U-Boot 2019.10 or later
- 1. Identify the current U-Boot version in use by checking the version during boot or in the build configuration
- 2. Obtain a fixed U-Boot release (2019.10 or later) from the official U-Boot repository at https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/releases
- 3. Build the new U-Boot image for your specific target platform using the standard build process (make CROSS_COMPILE=<toolchain> <board>_defconfig && make CROSS_COMPILE=<toolchain>)
- 4. Replace the vulnerable U-Boot binary/image on the target device using the appropriate flashing mechanism for your hardware
- 5. Verify the new version by checking the U-Boot banner during boot
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-14196 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-14196 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data