Email Security Appliance FirmwareOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2019-15988

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-11-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 12.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the antispam protection mechanisms of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass the URL reputation filters on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of URLs. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting the URL in a particular way. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the URL reputation filters that are configured for the affected device, which could allow malicious URLs to pass through the device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass URL reputation filters due to insufficient input validation of URLs. Attackers can craft malicious URLs in a specific way to evade detection and pass through the ESA device, potentially delivering phishing or malware content to end users.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patch/update to Cisco AsyncOS Software that addresses the input validation weakness in URL reputation filters. Ensure URL filtering policies are reviewed and tested after the update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Email Security Appliance FirmwareOperating system
Affected:<= 12.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Cisco ESA firmware version
    Access the ESA CLI or web interface and navigate to System Administration > Software Updates or use the 'version' command in the CLI to retrieve the current firmware version
    Affected if The installed firmware version is 12.5.0 or earlier (any version <= 12.5.0)
  2. Verify URL reputation filtering is enabled
    In the ESA web interface, go to Mail Policies > Inbound URL Filtering and confirm the 'Enable URL Filtering' option is turned on, or use the 'urlfilterconfig' CLI command
    Affected if URL reputation filtering is actively enabled on the device
  3. Review URL filtering logs for potential bypass attempts
    Use the ESA log subscriptions or the 'grep' command to search URL logs (typically found in URL Logs or Message Tracking) for anomalous URL patterns or unusually high volumes of URLs passing through without blocking
    Affected if Logs show URLs passing through that would normally be blocked by reputation filters, or unexpected URL patterns are detected

You are affected if your Cisco ESA runs firmware version 12.5.0 or earlier AND has URL reputation filtering enabled, as the bypass vulnerability exists in those configurations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 12.5.0
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patch/update to Cisco AsyncOS Software that addresses the input validation weakness in URL reputation filters. Ensure URL filtering policies are reviewed and tested after the update.

Fix this in Email Security Appliance Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-15988 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-15988 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data