ForticlientemsApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2019-16149

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-03-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.2.1 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation in FortiClientEMS version 6.2.0 may allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized code by injecting malicious payload in the user profile of a FortiClient instance being managed by the vulnerable system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in FortiClientEMS 6.2.0. An attacker with the ability to manipulate the user profile of a FortiClient instance managed by the EMS can inject malicious JavaScript payloads. When administrators or other users view the affected profile through the EMS management interface, the payload executes in their browsers, potentially allowing session hijacking or unauthorized actions.

MitigationUpgrade FortiClientEMS to the latest version containing the security patch. Until then, restrict administrative access to the EMS and validate/sanitize all user-supplied profile data before rendering.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ForticlientemsApplication
Affected:< 6.2.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify FortiClientEMS version
    Locate the FortiClientEMS installation and check the version information, typically found in the application properties, about page, or installer details
    Affected if The installed version is 6.2.0 or any version lower than 6.2.1
  2. Confirm EMS management interface is accessible
    Verify that the FortiClientEMS web console is reachable and accessible on the network
    Affected if The EMS management interface is exposed to users who can view endpoint profiles
  3. Inspect managed endpoint profiles for script content
    Access the EMS console and review the endpoint user profile fields (such as username, display name, or custom fields) for any unexpected or encoded characters that may indicate injected script tags
    Affected if Any managed endpoint profile contains HTML or JavaScript tags in user-controllable fields that are not sanitized before display
  4. Review EMS logs for XSS-related errors
    Examine the FortiClientEMS logs for entries containing script tags, javascript: URIs, or error patterns related to profile rendering
    Affected if Logs show attempted XSS payloads in profile-related operations

You are affected if FortiClientEMS version is below 6.2.1 and the EMS management interface can be accessed by users who can manipulate or view endpoint profiles.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.2.1 or later
Fixed in 6.2.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade FortiClientEMS to the latest version containing the security patch. Until then, restrict administrative access to the EMS and validate/sanitize all user-supplied profile data before rendering.

Recommended fix High confidence

FortiClientEMS 6.2.1

  1. 1. Download FortiClientEMS version 6.2.1 or later from the Fortinet support portal
  2. 2. Back up the current FortiClientEMS configuration
  3. 3. Stop the FortiClientEMS service
  4. 4. Install the FortiClientEMS 6.2.1 upgrade
  5. 5. Start the FortiClientEMS service
  6. 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the EMS version in the administration console

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Forticlientems Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-16149 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-16149 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data