CVE-2019-1647
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco SD-WAN Solution could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to bypass authentication and have direct unauthorized access to other vSmart containers. The vulnerability is due to an insecure default configuration of the affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by directly connecting to the exposed services. An exploit could allow the attacker to retrieve and modify critical system files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Cisco SD-WAN vSmart controllers have an insecure default configuration that exposes services directly. An authenticated attacker with adjacent network access can bypass authentication mechanisms and connect directly to these exposed services, allowing unauthorized access to other vSmart containers and the ability to retrieve and modify critical system files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 18.4.0all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco vSmart controllers in your environmentLocate all Cisco SD-WAN vSmart controller devices or virtual machines running the vSmart controller software. Check your inventory or use network discovery to find devices running the vSmart controller process.Affected if You have any Cisco vSmart controllers deployed in your network.
-
Check the installed vSmart software versionAccess the vSmart controller CLI and run the command to display the software version, typically 'show version' or 'show software'. Compare the version number against the affected range of versions prior to 18.4.0.Affected if The vSmart controller version is < 18.4.0 (or if the version cannot be determined but the device is a Vsmart Controller).
-
Verify network exposure of vSmart management servicesReview network access control lists, firewall rules, and segment configurations to determine if vSmart management or control plane services (such as HTTP, HTTPS, or other management interfaces) are accessible from network segments where unauthorized users could reside.Affected if Management or control services on the vSmart controller are exposed to adjacent or untrusted network segments without proper access restrictions.
-
Check for default service accessibilityFrom a host on an adjacent network segment, attempt to reach typical vSmart management ports (commonly 443/tcp, 8080/tcp, or as documented in Cisco SD-WAN deployment guides) to confirm if the controller responds to connection attempts without requiring authentication.Affected if The vSmart controller accepts connections on exposed service ports from unauthorized adjacent network hosts.
-
Confirm authentication configuration for exposed servicesReview the vSmart controller configuration to verify whether default authentication settings have been modified or whether service-level access controls have been explicitly configured to prevent unauthenticated access.Affected if The controller is using default configuration with services exposed and no explicit authentication controls applied to the accessible ports.
You are affected if you operate any Cisco vSmart controller with software version < 18.4.0 (or any version of Vsmart Controller) that has management or control services exposed to adjacent networks without proper authentication hardening.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data18.4.0
Apply Cisco's patches for this vulnerability and reconfigure the system to disable insecure default settings. Restrict access to exposed services and implement proper authentication controls per Cisco's hardening guidelines.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,680.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1647 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1647 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data