CVE-2019-17069
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedPuTTY before 0.73 might allow remote SSH-1 servers to cause a denial of service by accessing freed memory locations via an SSH1_MSG_DISCONNECT message.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePuTTY before 0.73 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in its SSH-1 protocol implementation. A malicious remote SSH-1 server can send a specially crafted SSH1_MSG_DISCONNECT message that causes the client to access freed memory locations, resulting in a denial of service (crash).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 0.73= 15.0= 15.1all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check PuTTY version numberRun 'putty --version' from command line, or open PuTTY and go to Help > About to view the versionAffected if Version is lower than 0.73 (e.g., 0.72, 0.71, etc.)
-
Verify if SSH-1 protocol is enabled or has been usedCheck PuTTY configuration under Connection > SSH and look for 'SSH protocol version' setting, or review saved session configurations for any that use SSH-1Affected if SSH-1 protocol is selected or any saved sessions use SSH-1 (protocol version 1)
-
Check OpenSUSE putty package version (OpenSUSE systems only)Run 'rpm -q putty' or 'zypper info putty' to retrieve the installed package versionAffected if Running OpenSUSE Leap 15.0 or 15.1 with putty package installed (all versions of putty on these OS versions are affected)
-
Confirm NetApp Oncommand Unified Manager installation (NetApp systems only)Run 'rpm -q Oncommand-Unified-Manager' or check for installation directory /opt/netapp/ocum/Affected if Oncommand Unified Manager Core Package is installed (all versions are affected per vendor advisory)
You are affected if you run any PuTTY version below 0.73 AND have SSH-1 protocol enabled or used, or if running affected OpenSUSE Leap 15.0/15.1 with putty, or any NetApp Oncommand Unified Manager version.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data0.73
Upgrade PuTTY to version 0.73 or later, which contains the fix for this vulnerability.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-17069 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-17069 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data