CVE-2019-1803
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the filesystem management for the Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) Mode Switch Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with administrator rights to gain elevated privileges as the root user on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to overly permissive file permissions of specific system files. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to an affected device, creating a crafted command string, and writing this crafted string to a specific file location. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary operating system commands as root on an affected device. The attacker would need to have valid administrator credentials for the device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLocal privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series ACI Mode Switch Software caused by overly permissive file permissions on specific system files. Authenticated administrator-level attackers can write crafted command strings to a specific file location to execute arbitrary OS commands as root.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm product is Cisco Nexus 9000 Series in ACI ModeRun 'show version' or 'show module' command to identify the switch model and confirm ACI mode is enabled via 'show system mode'Affected if The device is a Cisco Nexus 9000 Series switch running in ACI mode (Application Centric Infrastructure)
-
Verify the vulnerable file permissions existCheck file permissions on the specific system file location mentioned in the vulnerability. Use 'ls -la <file_path>' or equivalent command to inspect permissions. If the exact path is unknown, compare permissions on critical system files against vendor baseline documentation.Affected if Specific system files have overly permissive write permissions (world-writable or group-writable) that allow non-root administrators to modify them
-
Check for suspicious command strings in the target file locationExamine the content of the specific file location where crafted commands can be written. Use 'cat' or 'hexdump' to inspect file contents for unexpected command strings.Affected if The target file contains unexpected or unauthorized command strings that were not provisioned by the administrator
-
Review administrator account activity logsAudit admin account usage and command history via 'show accounting log' or equivalent logging mechanisms. Look for commands that modified system files or escalated privileges unexpectedly.Affected if Administrator accounts show execution of file modification or privilege escalation commands that were not initiated by legitimate administrators
A user is affected if they have a Cisco Nexus 9000 Series switch running in ACI mode where the vulnerable file location has permissive write permissions and could accept crafted command strings from authenticated administrators.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco vendor patch when available; until then, restrict administrator access strictly, monitor file system integrity, and review admin account usage logs for suspicious activity.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1803 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1803 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data